SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 312

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY AND G.N. RAY, JJ.
Brijpal Singh and others, Appellants
Versus
State of U.P. and others, Respondents.
Criminal Appeal No. 176 of 1984, D/-30-3-1993.

Advocates:
A.S.PUNDIR, D.K.GARG, R.K.GARG

Headnote:(i) Motive for Crime - Past enmity proved by prosecution - Recent damage of crops and threatening to take revenge - Sessions Judge holding that the accused had neither the remote motive nor immediate motive for commission of crime - High Court held that reason of Sessions Judge was highly unsound - Whether cord? (Yes) (Para 5) (I.P.C. 1860 - Sections 302 r/w 149, 324/149 and 148)

        (ii) Appreciation of Evidence of Eye witnesses - Evidence of interested witnesses - Sessions Court refusing to place any reliance on it - Reasons given their involvement in same criminal and civil cases - Whether correct? (No) (Para 6) - Eye witnesses found amply corroborated by the Medical evidence - Precaution to be taken in case of interested witnesses (Cr. P.C. 1973 session 379 r/w section 2 of S.C. (Enlargement of Cr. Jurisdiction) Act, 1970)

       Held: However, in a case of this nature where the witnesses are Interested, by way of rule of caution we think it would be safe to convict only such of those accused to whom specific overt acts have been attributed. As spoken to by all these witnesses, the definite case that emerges is that on the day of occurrence some minor altercation took place at about 4 p.m. when the Holi festival offerings were going to be made. According to these witnesses Kalyan Singh (since dead) and Deep Singh, A-4 armed with lathis, Prem Pal Singh, A-5 armed with a gun and rest armed with country-made pistols came there. The only overt act attributed to Kalyan Singh and Deep Singh, A4 is that they pointed towards Sikdar, P.W. 1 and said that his family members should not be left out. Thereafter Prern Pal Singh, A-5 fired at Sripal, deceased and the remaining accused fired with their country-made pistols towards members of the family of Sikdar. It can thus be seen that Deep Singh, A-4 has not played any active role in the occurrence. No doubt any form of instigation also would make him liable constructively. Since we are dealing with interested witnesses, it would be safe to convict only such of those accused who participated in the occurrence and caused injuries. When the witnesses are highly interested and when the circumstances also go to show that several people gathered at the place of occurrence watching the Holi festival, perhaps it becomes all the more necessary to scrutinise the evidence of these interested witnesses with great care and caution. With a view to avoid any danger of convicting a person who could have been simply present or at any rate who had not played any active role which in those special circumstances may throw a doubt about his being a member of the unlawful assembly, we think the safe test is to see whether overt acts were attributed. In this view of the matter we think it is a fit case where Deep Singh, A-4 should be given benefit of doubt but by this we are not in any manner doubting the veracity of the three eye-witnesses. Accordingly the convictions and sentences awarded against Deep Singh, A-4 are set aside and he is acquitted of all the charges. If he is on bail his bail bonds shall be cancelled. The convictions and sentences awarded against the remaining accused are confirmed. (para 8)

        (iii) Delay in filing F.I.R. and in examination of injured - Explanation given - Evidence rejected by sessions Judge solely on ground of delay - Whether correct? (No) (Para 7) (I.P.C. 1860 - Section 302 r/w 149,324/149 and 148)

Judgment

K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY, J.:- This is a regular appeal under Section 379, Cr. P. C. read with Section 2 of the SC (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970. There are six appellants. They along with one Kalyan Singh who died during the trial, were tried for offences punishable u / S. 302 read with S. 149, I. P. C. by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Shahjahanpur and were acquitted. The State preferred an appeal against the remaining six accused. The High Court allowed the appeal. However, two of them A-5 Prem Pal Singh and A-6 Shyam Pat Singh who were children, were not awarded any sentence and the remaining four accused were sentenced to imprisonment for life. They were also convicted under Sections 324/149 and 148 and sentenced to two years and one year R.I. respectively. The sentences were directed to run concurrently. All of them have preferred this appeal. The prosecution case is as follows:

All the accused are related to each other and are Thakurs by caste while the deceased Sripal and the injured witnesses are Kachuwahas and all of them belong to the same Village Deshpur. The Village is predominantly inhabited by Thakurs and there was animosity between the accused and the deceased. It is alleged that in the year 1933 Narpat, the father of Sikdar, P.W. 1 was murdered and the relations of the accused Kalyan Singh were charged for that murder and were convicted. In 1967 one Premwati and Muthu were joint owners of land and Premwati sold her share to Sikdar and Muthu objected to the mutation but mutation was allowed. Muthu having got annoyed mortgaged his half share in favour of Kalyan Singh with a view to harass Sikdar. It is further alleged that Kalyan Singh damaged the crop of Sikdar as a result of which proceedings under Section 145, Cr. P. C. were initiated and the land purchased by Sikdar was attached. On 8-3-74 at about 10 a.m. Sikdar was passing near the attached land when he saw Prem Pal Singh, A-5 and Brij Pal Singh, A- 1 damaging the pea crops. Sikdar made a complaint to Jai Singh, Superdar, P.W. 3 and went to the spot along with him. Superdar P.W. 3 reprimanded Prem Pal Singh and Brij Pal Singh which they did not like. The present occurrence took place at about 4 p.m. on 8-3-74. Sikdar was sitting on the chabutra of Ram Singh in front of chopal along with Sheda and Rameshwar. Gokaran and Ram Lal, brothers of Sikdar and Sheoraj son of Sripal were also standing in front of their houses. It was a Holi festival and offerings were to be made to the Holi fire as per the custom. Vijay Singh, a close relative of Kalyan Singh asked Sikdar to come and make offerings in the Holika i.e. Holi fire but Sikdar declined. Shortly thereafter Kalyan Singh and Deep Singh, A-4 armed with lathis, Prem Singh, A-5 armed with a gun, Brij Pal Singh, A-1, Ram Pal, A-2 and Shiv Mangal Singh, A-3 armed with country-made pistols came from the south. It is alleged that Kalyan Singh and Deep Singh accused pointed to Sikdar and his family members and said that they should be killed. Thereupon Prem Pal Singh, A-5 fired his gun which hit Sripal son of Gokaran who fell down. The accused persons armed with country-made pistols fired at Sikdar and other members of his family and caused injuries to Sikdar, his brother Ram Lal, P.W. 2 and Gokaran and his son Sheoraj. This occurrence was also witnessed - by Rameshwar P.W. 4, Sheda, Mulaiam and Raghunath. When the witnesses remonstrated the seven assailants ran away towards south. Sikdar, P.W. 1 arranged to take the injured to the Police Station but he was informed that the accused persons were lying in ambush on the way to Mirzapur, upon which Sikdar decided to proceed to Police Station, Jalalabad instead of going to Mirzapur. Sripal however died due to the injuries on the way before reaching the Police Station. Sikdar, however, gave an FIR on 9-3-74 at about 6.30 a.m. and the papers were transferred to Police Station, Mirzapur as the case related to the jurisdiction of t









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top