SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 941

G.N.RAY, K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY
Sudam Hari Patil – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY, J.:- Special leave granted.

The appellant, who was working as an Extension Officer (Industries) with Thana Zilla Parishad, was convicted under S. 5(l)(d) read with S. 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to undergo one years R.I. and to pay a fine of Rs. 300/- in default of payment of which to further undergo three months R.I. He was also found guilty under S. 161, I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo one years R.I. and to pay a fine of Rs. 200/ - in default of payment of which to further undergo R.I. for two months. The appeal preferred by him was dismissed by the High Court. Hence the present appeal.

2. According to the prosecution, he being a public servant, demanded a bribe for doing a favour of recommending the application of the complainant. A trap was laid and the tainted money was recovered and he was found guilty. Notice was issued by this Court limited to the question of sentence. The offence is said to have been committed in the year 1984. The appellant has lost his job and for all these years, he has undergone the agony of criminal proceedings. He has also a large family to support. He is now in jail. For all these special reason


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top