SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 158

M.N.VENKATACHALIAH, K.RAMASWAMY
Deep Chand – Appellant
Versus
Land Acquisition Officer – Respondent


Advocates:
A.G.Ratnaparkhi, B.Y.Kulkarni, P.S.POTI, S.K.AGNIHOTRI, S.K.Gambhir, VIVEK GAMBHIR

JUDGMENT

This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the Division Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court dated July 30, 1974 in which it was held that an order passed by the Civil Court on reference under S. 49(1)of the Land Acquisition Act 1 of 1894 (for short the Act) is not a decree and, therefore, an appeal would not lie therefrom under S. 96 of C. P. C.

2. The facts lie in a short compass. Notification under S. 4(1)and declaration under S. 6, of the Act were published in the State Gazette acquiring land measuring 2 acres 46 cents (approximately) on Biaora village in Rajgarh District. The appellant had objected under S. 49(1)of the Act to the acquisition, contending that the entire land including his factory and office building should be acquired, without which the Act should not be put in operation. Thereon, reference under S. 49(1)was made to the Civil Court which by order dated April 29, 1969 held that the land proposed to be acquired did not form an integral part of appellants factory and office buildings and answered the reference accordingly. The appellants carried the matter in appeal to the High Court. In the High Court, when an objection was raised on behalf of the
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top