SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 386

B.L.HANSARIA, K.RAMASWAMY
P. K. Vijayan – Appellant
Versus
Kamalakshi Amma – Respondent


Advocates:
E.M.S.ANAM, N.SUDHAKARAN, P.S.POTI

Judgment

K. RAMASWAMY, J. :- Leave granted.

2. This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the High Court of Kerala dated August 18, 1988 made in C.R.P. No. 2220 of 1987B. The respondent-landlords filed R.C.P. No. 19 of 1974 under S. 11 of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, for eviction of the appellant-tenant. Under the proviso thereto if the tenant denies the title of the landlord or claims right of permanent tenancy, the Rent Controller shall decide whether the denial or claim is bona fide. Recording of such a finding positively in favour of the tenant will require the landlord to sue for eviction of the tenant in a Civil Court. The Rent Controller had accepted the plea of the tenant to be bona fide and relegated the respondents to seek eviction by a civil suit. Before its initiation, the appellant filed DA No. 11730 of 1986 before the Land Tribunal under the Kerala Land Reforms Act claiming that the lease was of the agricultural land and as a cultivating tenant, he is entitled to get assignment of the title of the land under S. 72B of the Land Reforms Act which postulates that the cultivating tenant of any holding or part of a holding, the right, title






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top