SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 537

KULDIP SINGH, B.L.HANSARIA
Urmilla Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Khalil Ahmad – Respondent


Advocates:
K.K.GUPTA, PRAMOD DAYAL, RAM A.MISHRA, S.M.Sarin

Judgment

KULDIP SINGH, J.:- Special leave granted.

2. Ram Kishore Pandey - while coming home on a cycle from work -was run over by car No. UPC 8527 on March 3,1970 and died almost instantaneously. He was 29 years of age. He left behind his widow Urmilla Devi and two minor children who were infants. Almost a quarter century has passed by but the unfortunate widow and the orphan children have not as yet been paid a single penny by way of compensation.

3. Urmilla Pandey widow of Ram Kishore Pandey filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal , A Allahbad claiming Rupees 1, 17,747.70 as compensation on account of the death of her husband in the car accident. Khalil Ahmad, the driver of the car; Ram Kishan (dead) through his son Purshottam alias Balwa, the owner of the car; M/s. Chandra Financiers; and the New India Assurance Company were impleaded as respondents before the Tribunal. The Tribunal came to the conclusion that the accident took place on account of the car being driven rashly and negligently by Khalil Ahmad, the driver of the car. While assessing the compensation the Tribunal held that the age of 58 years at which the deceased would have retired by taken as
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top