A.S.ANAND, FAIZAN UDDIN
Arjun – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
Judgment
FAIZAN UDDIN, J.:- This appeal by special leave of this Court has been directed against the judgment of the High Court of Rajasthan passed in Criminal Appeal No. 285/90 affirming the conviction of the four appellants for an offence under Section 302. I.P.C. by the Additional Sessions Judge. Deeg in Sessions case No. 8/89; imposing sentence of life imprisonment on all the four appellants (herein).
2. The four appellants, namely Arjun, Rampal, Bhagwan Singh and Mukhoram were charged and tried along with four other acquitted accused, namely, Nathu, Pannalal, Damodarlal and Badley under Sections 302 and 148 read with Section 149 of the I.P.C.
3. The prosecution case was that on 27-11-88 at about 11 a.m. when the deceased Jyoti Ram followed by his brother Bohari PW 1, was going from his village Baroli Dhau to an adjoining village Pasopa to purchase water pipe, he was way laid and surrounded by the appellants and four other co-accused who emerged from mustard field. The appellants Bhagwan Sahai, Rampal and Arjun were armed with Farsas and the appellant Mukho Ram was armed with Ballam while the rest of the four acquitted accused are said to be armed with lathies. It is said that the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.