SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 643

A.S.ANAND, FAIZAN UDDIN
Arjun – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
ARUNESHVAR GUPTA, HARDEV SINGH, K.S.BHATT, MADHU MULCHANDANI, SUSHIL JAIN

Judgment

FAIZAN UDDIN, J.:- This appeal by special leave of this Court has been directed against the judgment of the High Court of Rajasthan passed in Criminal Appeal No. 285/90 affirming the conviction of the four appellants for an offence under Section 302. I.P.C. by the Additional Sessions Judge. Deeg in Sessions case No. 8/89; imposing sentence of life imprisonment on all the four appellants (herein).

2. The four appellants, namely Arjun, Rampal, Bhagwan Singh and Mukhoram were charged and tried along with four other acquitted accused, namely, Nathu, Pannalal, Damodarlal and Badley under Sections 302 and 148 read with Section 149 of the I.P.C.

3. The prosecution case was that on 27-11-88 at about 11 a.m. when the deceased Jyoti Ram followed by his brother Bohari PW 1, was going from his village Baroli Dhau to an adjoining village Pasopa to purchase water pipe, he was way laid and surrounded by the appellants and four other co-accused who emerged from mustard field. The appellants Bhagwan Sahai, Rampal and Arjun were armed with Farsas and the appellant Mukho Ram was armed with Ballam while the rest of the four acquitted accused are said to be armed with lathies. It is said that the























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top