SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 645

G.N.RAY, K.RAMASWAMY
Devkaran Nenshi Tanna – Appellant
Versus
Manharlal Nenshi – Respondent


Advocates:
Amrita Mitra, M.L.Verma, P.C.KAPUR, Ravindra Narayan, T.U.Mehta

JUDGMENT

This appeal by special leave arises from the Judgment of the Gujarat High Court in Civil Revision Application No. 1226/72, dated November 22/23, 1975. The facts for the purpose of disposal of his appeal lie in a short compass.

2. The appellant landlord laid a claim for arrears of rent and the respondent shot back by filing an application under S. 11 of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging H. R. Control Act, for short the Act, for determination of the standard rent. On a compromise the standard rent was fixed at Rs. 211/per month and the application was dismissed as not pressed. Later the appellant filed regular suit for possession and for arrears which was decreed and on appeal it was confirmed. The defence of the respondent was that there was bona fide dispute as to standard rent and an application under S. 12(3)(a) read with S. 11 (1)(c) would lie and so he made the application and even before an adjudication was made, he deposited the arrears subject to fixation of standard rent so as to avoid decree of eviction. So there was no default. Civil Court held that the application would not lie under S. 12(3)(a) and the tenant was liable to eviction. Thus though the respondent w

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top