SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 177

FAIZAN UDDIN, S.C.AGRAWAL
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
D. Mohan – Respondent


Advocates:
ANIL KATIYAR, C.S.VAIDYANATHAN, KRISHAN MAHAJAN, M.M.KASHYAP, N.Ambrish

JUDGMENT

FAIZAN UDDIN, J.-—Leave granted.

2. In this appeal by special leave, the appellants have challenged the order dated 20-8-1993 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad in Original Application No. 765 of 1993 filed by the 16 respondents herein questioning the order dated 26-5-1993 whereby they were transferred from Hyderabad Telecom District to the Telangana District of Andhra Pradesh Telecom Service.

3. The respondents herein were working as Junior Engineers in the Telephone District, Hyderabad as on 1-11-1986 under the administrative control of the General Manager, Telephone District, Hyderabad. The respondents were either recruited in the Telephone District, Hyderabad or they were transferred under Rule 38 from other districts and had joined Hyderabad District on bottom seniority. Originally the Telephone District, Hyderabad was a separate independent unit by itself and the recruitment, transfers and postings of the entire staff including the Junior Engineers were confined to the twin cities of Hyderabad and Secunderabad which were under the jurisdiction and administrative control of General Manager, Telephone District, Hyderabad.

4. The re











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top