SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 126

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
BEFORE KULDIP SlNGH, S.C. AGRAWAL AND B.L. HANSARIA, JJ.
RAVI PAUL AND OTHERS
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS.
Writ Petition (C) No. 146 of 1992 and Civil Appeal No. 4127 of 19851
Decided on 19-1-1995
Advocates appeared:
K.T.S. Tulsi, Additional Solicitor General, Harish N. Salve and P.P. Rao, Senior Advocates (Ashok K. Mahajan, K.K. Mohan, Ms Geetanjali Mohan, P. Parameswaran, A. Subba Rao, Ms A. Subhashini, C.V.S. Rao, Dipak K. Nag, Advocates for V.B. Saharya & Co., with them) for the appearing parties.

Advocates:
A.SUBBA RAO, A.Subhashini, ASHOK MAHAJAN, C.V.SUBBA RAO, DIPAK K.NAG, GITANJALI MOHAN, HARISH N.SLAVE, K.K.Mohan, K.T.S.Tulsi, P.P.Rao, P.PARMESHVARAN, V.B.SAHARYA

Headnote:

Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 - Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Section 141, 142 - Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rule 113 - Appointment to Posts of Deputy Commandant - Rank of Captain or Retired - Permanent Regular Commission - Whether said Officers are entitled to count service rendered by them in Army for purpose of fixation of their seniority in the Border Security Force - These matters raise common question regarding determination of seniority of Emergency Commissioned Officers (ECOs) and Short Service Commissioned Officers (SSCOs) who were recruited as Assistant Commandants in the Border Security Force after their release from the Army. The question is whether the said Officers are entitled to count the service rendered by them in the Army for the purpose of fixation of their seniority in the Border Security Force – Held, they were absorbed in BSF at a time when there was need for competent officers in BSF and in order to attract such officers in the BSF it was considered necessary to give the benefit of service of the Army for purpose of seniority in BSF to the officers who were absorbed/appointed in the BSF during period SSCOs had joined the Army as a career after emergency resulting from the Chinese aggression was over - When they were absorbed/appointed to the BSF during period there was a change in policy of the Government of India and benefit of the service in Army was not to be given to SSCOs who were absorbed/appointed in the BSF after release from Army. This condition was expressly mentioned in their letters of appointment and they opted to join BSF knowing full well that their Army service would not be counted for seniority in BSF. The ECOs who were absorbed/appointed in BSF during period and SSCOs who were absorbed/appointed in the BSF during period are officers belonging to two different categories and they cannot be regarded as persons similarly situate - Writ Petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT

S.C. AGRAWAL, J.- Both these matters raise a common question regarding determination of seniority of Emergency Commissioned Officers (ECOs) and Short Service Commissioned Officers (SSCOs) who were recruited as Assistant Commandants in the Border Security Force after their release from the Army. The question is whether the said Officers are entitled to count the service rendered by them in the Army for the purpose of fixation of their seniority in the Border Security Force.

2. In the wake of the Chinese aggression in 1962, in order to meet the shortage of Commissioned Officers in the Indian Army, the Government of India started a special scheme to select officers through Service Selection Board and granting them Commission in the Indian Army. Such Commissioned Officers were called Emergency Commissioned Officers (ECOs). In 1965, in addition to the Emergency Commissioned Officers the system of Short Service Commission (SSC) was introduced. The initial period of such Commission was 5 years but it was extendable for another 5 years depending on the requirement/suitability of the officer. After the expiry of the initial period of 5 years, the officer, even if granted extension, could request for release during the extended period at any stage. After the expiry of the extended period, he was to be released unless he was found acceptable for grant of permanent Commission in the Indian Army and was granted permanent Commission.

3. The Border Security Force is one of the paramilitary forces of the Government of India. It was constituted in 1965. It was initially governed by Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as thr CRPF Rules) made under the provisions of the Central Reserve Poli Force Act, 1949. For that purpose Chapter XV (Rules 112 to 116) v inserted in the CRPF Rules on 21-12-1966. The said Chapter bears ? heading "Special Provisions relating to Border Security Force". Rule 113 thus introduced made provision for appointment and promotion of superior officers. Sub-rule (2) of Rule 113 related to appointment to the posts of Deputy Commandant, Assistant Commandant or Adjutant or Joint Assistant Directors or other equivalent rank and sub-rule (3) related to appointment to the posts of Company Commanders, Quartermasters and Junior Staff Officers and other posts in the force equivalent thereto. On 11-5-1967, the CRPF Rules were further amended and clause (zv-A) was inserted in sub-rule (3) of Rule 113 and thereby provision was made for appointment of ECOs and SSCOs who were commissioned on or after 1-11-1962 and were released at any time thereafter. A similar provision was contained in clause (iv-A) introduced in sub-rule (4) of Rule 105 of the CRPF Rules which provided for appointment to the post of Company Commander or Quartermaster in Battalions other than Signal Battalions or Assistant Principal Central Training College in the Central Reserve Police Force. On 2-9-1968, Parliament enacted the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the "BSF Act") to provide for the constitution and regulation of an armed force of the Union for ensuring the security of the borders of India and for matters connected therewith. Sub-section (1) of Section 141 of the BSF Act empowers the Central Government to make rules for the purpose of carrying into effect the provisions of the said Act. Clause (b) of sub-section (2) of Section 141 confers the specific power to frame rales to provide for the enrolment of persons to the force and the recruitment of other members of the Force. Clause (c) of sub-section (2) of Section 141 confers the power to make rules providing for conditions of service (including deductions from pay and allowances) of the members of the Force. Under sub-section (2) of Section 142 members of the Border Security Force in existence at the commencement of the Act are deemed to have been appointed or, as the case may be, enrolled as such under the Act.

4. In exercise of the powers conf









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top