SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 498

S.C.AGRAWAL, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Advaita Nand – Appellant
Versus
Judge, Small Cause Court, Meerut – Respondent


Advocates:
JITENDRA SHARMA, M.P.S.TOMAR, R.K.SHUKLA, SANDHYA GOSVAMI, SATISH CHANDRA AGRAWAL

JUDGMENT

S.C. AGRAWAL, J.-Leave granted.

2. This appeal by the tenant arises out of a suit for eviction filed by Respondent 3 on the ground of default in payment of rent under the provisions of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). The said suit was filed in the court of Judge, Small Cause Court, Meerut on 9-1-1990. Summons were issued fixing 20-3-1990 as the date for filing the written statement and 28-3-1990 was the date fixed for final hearing of the case in the court. It appears that the copy of the plaint was not annexed with the summons served on the appellant. The appellant, therefore, moved an application before the court on 28-3-1990 praying for supply of copy of the plaint. The said copy was supplied to the appellant on 28-3-1990 itself and on that day the court passed an order directing that the written statement be filed within one month and 24-7-1990 was fixed as the date for final hearing of the case. On 2-5-1990 the appellant deposited the entire amount of rent that was due and claimed protection from eviction under Section 20(4) of the Act. The Judge, Small Cause Court, however, held that



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top