SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 845

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, K.S.PARIPOORNAN, SUHAS C.SEN
Cosmic Dye Chemical – Appellant
Versus
Collector Of Central Excise, Bombay – Respondent


ORDER

1. The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of two kinds of dyes. One is called the Rapidogens and the other Naphthol ASG. So far as Rapidogens is concerned, it was held exempt from duty totally by virtue of Notification No. 180/61 dated 23-11-1961. Naphthol ASG was, of course, not exempt from duty under the said notification. In the case of this product, the appellant claimed the benefit of another exemption notification being Notification No. 71/78 dated 1-3-1978. This notification provided that if the total production of excisable goods in a factory does not exceed 13.75 lakhs in the preceding financial year, then clearances up to five lakhs will be exempt from duty. In his declaration filed for the purpose of claiming the benefit of Notification No. 71/78, the appellant stated that the excisable goods manufactured by him during the year 1977-78 (previous financial year) was Rs 3,25,200 only. On the basis of the said declaration, benefit of Notification No. 71/78 was extended to him.

2. On 19-11-1981, the Assistant Collector issued a notice to the appellant calling upon him to show cause as to why he should not be deprived of the benefit of Notification No. 71/78 inasmuch











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top