SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MOHAN S. (J).
DELHI DOMESTIC WORKING WOMENS FORUM
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS.
Decided on 19-10-1994
BENCH: MOHAN S. (J): VENKATACHALLIAH M.N.(CJ): MAJMUDAR S.B. (J).
Criminal Justice Act, 1972 - Section 10 - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 32, 38(1) - Domestic Working Women’s - Sexual Assault by Seven Army - Petitioner Delhi Domestic Working Women’s Forum to espouse pathetic plight of four domestic servants who were subject to indecent sexual assault by seven army personnel – Petitioner stating that “I was coming from my home town along with my village girls D/o Boas Minz, was travelling in SHI Coach - I slept on Berth No. 50. Our friend, Shanti, woke up and told that some persons were teasing her - When, I and my remaining friends got up, we saw that about 7/8 army jawans had come near us - Then we all friends got up and sat on our respective seats - Then all those army men began to molest us. First they two Sikhs and 6 clean-shaved men made me and my five friends sit on lower seats and then kissed and hugged us and lured on our body and breasts - On our objection they caught us from our hair and began to beat us - When we tried to cry, they shut our mouths - Then they threatened me and my friends that in case we will make any hue and cry they will throw us out of the running train and will kill us – Held, Compensation payable by offender was introduced in which gave Courts powers to make an ancillary order for compensation in addition to main penalty in cases where injury, loss, or damage had resulted. The Criminal Justice Act, 1982 made it possible for first time to make compensation order as sole penalty - It also required that in cases where fines and compensation orders were given together, payment of compensation should take priority over the fine - It required courts to consider the making of a compensation order in every case of death, injury, loss or damage and, where such an order was not given, impose a duty on the court to give reasons for not doing so - It also extended range of injuries eligible for compensation. These new requirements mean that if court fails to make compensation order it must furnish reasons. Where reasons are given, the victim may apply for these to be subject to judicial review - Criminal Justice Act contains a number of provisions which directly or indirectly encourage an even greater role for compensation - Writ petition disposed of
JUDGMENT:
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.MOHAN, J.- This public interest litigation invokes the benign provision of Article 32 of the Constitution of India, at the instance of the petitioner Delhi Domestic Working Womens Forum to espouse the pathetic plight of four domestic servants who were subject to indecent sexual assault by seven army personnel.
2.The incident, with a filmy background, has outclassed even the movies. On 10-2-1993, six women, by name, Usha Minz, Shanti, Josphine Kerketta, Rosy Kerketta, Nilli and Lili, domestic servants, were travelling by the Muri Express. The journey was from Ranchi to Delhi. One of the victims Miss Lili described the incidence graphically as follows:
"I was coming from my home town to Delhi by the Muri Express. On 10-2-1993 at about 11.00 p.m., the Muri Express was at Khurja Railway Station. At that time, I along with my village girls (1) Usha Minz D/o John Minz (2) Shanti D/o Siri Anuas Minz (3) Josphine Kerketta D/o Junus Kerketta (4) Rosy Kerketta D/o Remis Kerketta (5) Nilli Ross D/o Boas Minz, was travelling in SHI Coach. I slept on Berth No. 50. Our friend, Shanti, woke up and told that some persons were teasing her. When, I and my remaining friends got up, we saw that about 7/8 army jawans had come near us. Then we all friends got up and sat on our respective seats. Then all those army men began to molest us. First they two Sikhs and 6 clean-shaved men made me and my five friends sit on lower seats and then kissed and hugged us and lured on our body and breasts. On our objection they caught us from our hair and began to beat us. When we tried to cry, they shut our mouths. Then they threatened me and my friends that in case we will make any hue and cry they will throw us out of the running train and will kill us. On this we got frightened and sat there. From these 8 army men two Sikhs and 6 clean-shaved, one Sardar and one clean-shaved man forcibly made me to lie down on the lower berth and on the other adjacent lower berth another Sardar took another girl and one clean-shaved fauji took Rosy to bathroom. Two other army men made Shanti to lie down on the nearby seat. Another two men tried to take Usha and Nilli but both sat under the seat to hide themselves. Thereafter, first Sardar fauji (whose name has been disclosed in the court as Dhir Singh S/o Puran Singh, PO: Dostpur, PS : Kalanaur, District Gurdaspur, Punjab) forcibly put off my clothes and removed underwear, raped me. After him, another clean-shaved fauji, whose face is round and height is about 58" raped me. My friends, Shanti and Rosy were also forcibly raped by remaining army men. Thereafter, we tried to lodge a report with the police on the way, but nobody listened to us. When the train stopped at New Delhi Railway Station, then I and my friends attempted to catch these persons. They all got down and ran here and there. However, I and my friends could catch hold of aforesaid Sardar Dhir Singh, who had raped me. We all caught him. In the meanwhile, some persons gathered there. Some army officers and policemen overpowered him and took him to MCO office. Then after a while they came in Station and handed over Sardar Dhir Singh to you. Sardar Dhir Singh has raped me and his colleagues have raped my friends."
3. This formed the basis of the first information report for offences under section 376-B read with Section 341 IPC which was registered at the Police Station, New Delhi Railway Station (Crime & Railways) as No. 049 of 1993 at 6.35 a.m. on 11-2-1993. It appears after registering the FIR the six rape victims were sent for medical check-up.
4. The members of the petitioner-forum went in groups to all the addresses given by the police to meet the victims. In none of the places they were allowed to meet the victims though the employers admitted gaining knowledge about the rape and the victims were with them. The petitioner forum is very much concerned as the victims are its members, to get the needed social, cult
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.