SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 1009

K.RAMASWAMY, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
U. P. Jal Nigam – Appellant
Versus
Nareshwar Sahai Mathur – Respondent


Advocates:
GOPAL SUBRAMANIUM, N.S.BISHT, PRAMOD SVARUP, R.B.MISHRA, Syed Abu Ahmad

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The matter relates to promotion to the post of Chief Engineer, Level II in U.P. Jal Nigam. The U.P. Public Services Tribunal is specially constituted to consider the service grievances of government servants of the U.P. State. When government servants, Mr Om Narain Dwivedi and Mr S.C. Atri, approached the High Court of Allahabad at Allahabad Bench for redressal of their service grievances, two different Benches of the High Court by orders dated 23-3-1993 and 15-4-1993 directed to avail themselves of the statutory alternative remedy available from the Tribunal and in case they were unsuccessful in getting the relief, to approach the High Court. The respondent, who was also a government servant filed the writ petition in the High Court of Allahabad at Lucknow Bench seeking relief as regards his service grievance and the High Court entertained the writ petition and directed the parties to complete their pleadings. The appellant filed an application to dismiss the writ petition and direct the respondent to avail himself of the statutory remedy. The Division Bench, by the impugned order dated 19-1-1994, held that since the pleadings were complete, it was not nec




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top