ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. These appeals arise from the judgment of the High Court of Allahabad dated 29-1-1992 made in WP No. 16908 of 1989 and batch. The only controversy in these cases is whether the Collector was right in determining the compensation under Section 28-A of the Act. The notification under Section 4(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Act No. 1 of 1894, for short the Act, was published on 9-2-1962. The Collector passed the awards relating to three villages on different dates determining the compensation. Some of the claimants received the compensation without protest and some on protest. Those who received the compensation under protest sought for and secured references under Section 18 to the Civil Court. The Additional District Judge, Ghaziabad in his award and decree dated 23-5-1987 enhanced the compensation. The State filed FA No. 668 of 1987 which is pending disposal in the High Court at Allahabad. The claimants who received the compensation without protest made applications under Section 28-A(l) of the Act. Following the award of the District Court, the Land Acquisition Officer passed the award under Section 28-A(2) of the Act. This was challenged by the app