SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 293

J.S.VERMA, K.S.PARIPOORNAN
Integrated Rural Development Agency – Appellant
Versus
Ram Pyare Pandey – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.SRIVASTAVA, P.K.JAIN, S.A.Gilani

JUDGMENT

PARIPOORNAN, J.—Special leave granted.

2. The defendant in OS No. 1204 of 1981, in Munsiff Court No. 3, Deoria, is the appellant. The plaintiff in the suit is the respondent. The appellant. Integrated Rural Development Agency is a body registered under the Societies Registration Act. It has its own Articles of Association. The respondent-plaintiff was appointed as Junior Clerk in the Integrated Rural Development Agency on 14-5-1980 against a permanent vacancy. His service was terminated on 6-6-1980. Thereupon, the respondent filed a suit and prayed for the grant of a declaration that the termination order was illegal and void and it was passed in violation of the rules governing the appellant. The learned Munsiff held that the appointment of the respondent was temporary and the termination order was not illegal or void and dismissed the suit. The respondent-plaintiff filed an appeal before the VIth Additional District Judge, Deoria. Civil Appeal No. 186 of 1982. By judgment dated 29-4-1983 the appeal was dismissed. Thereafter, the respondent-plaintiff filed Second Appeal No. 2163 of 1983 in the High Court of Allahabad. Katju, J. by judgment dated 22-3-1993 held that the ter

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top