SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 1007

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.M. AHMADI, R.M. SAHAI AND K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY, JJ.
Director, General Rice Research Institution, Cuttack and another, Appellants
Versus
Khetra Mohan Das, Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 4729 of 1991
Decided on 6-10-1994.

Advocates:
A.P.MEDH, BINU TARNTA, P.N.MISHRA, RANJIT GHOSAL, YASHANK ADHYARU

Headnote:

Appointment For a Senior Field Assistant - Promotion Of Respondent - An advertisement was made inviting applications for appointment for a Senior Field Assistant, one of technical posts mentioned in Hand Book of Technical Services under I.C.A.R - Concerned employment exchange sponsored name of respondent who held a degree of B.Sc. (Hons.) - He was appointed in year 1971 in Central Rice Research institute –Respondent was inducted into Category I Grade T-2 and as seen above scale of pay for persons holding post in Category I Grade T-2 was fixed at Rs. 330-560 - The respondent made a representation that as per rules he ought to have been fitted in the lowest grade of Category II i.e., T-II-3 for which the scale of pay prescribed is Rs. 425-700 and also that a Field/Farm Technician holding either a 3 years diploma or a bachelors degree in relevant field should be fitted in Category II - Held, Respondent has been promoted to Grade T-I-3 of Category I carrying the same scale as Grade T-II-3 of Category II, therefore he should be deemed to have been inducted into Grade. T-II-3 Category II - This reasoning is erroneous - Crucial date on which date Rules came into force and for fitment into necessary categories Rule 5.1 has to be applied and existing employees should be fitted only in grades specified in para 3.1 on point to point basis on basis of their existing scales of pay on that date - Subsequent promotion of respondent from Grade T-II of Category I to Grade T-I-3, higher grade in same Category cannot make any difference so far as initial fitment is concerned as contemplated under Rule5.1 - Tribunal also made a reference to Rule 8.1 which applies only to direct recruits and it has no relevance so far as case of respondent is concerned - For all above, reasons , finding of Tribunal that respondents should be held to have been appointed in Grade T-II-3 of Category II in pay scale of Rs. 425-700 with effect from. 1-10-1975 is set aside - Appeal Allowed.

JUDGMENT

K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY, J.: -This appeal by the Director, General Rice Research Institute is filed against the order of the Central Administrative Tribuanl, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack holding that the respondent Khetra Mohan Das should he held to have been apointed in the Category II, Grade T-II-3 in the scale of pay of Rs. 425-700 with effect from the date the Technical Services Rules of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research ("I.C.A.R." for short) came into force. To appreciate the point involved, it is necessary to state few material facts.

2. An advertisement was made inviting applications for appointment for a Senior Field Assistant, one of the techinical posts mentioned in the Hand Book of the Technical Services under the I.C.A.R. The concerned employement exchange sponsered the name of the respondent who held a degree of of B.Sc. (Hons.) He was appointed in the year 1971 in the Central Rice Reasearch institute ("C.R.R.I." for short) Cuttack, a wing of

I.C.A.R. as a Senior Field Assistant in the scale of the pay of Rs. 150-300. On the report of the Third Pay Commission, that scale was revised to Rs. 330-560 with effect from 1-1-73. On 1-10-75 the Technical Service Rules of the I.C.R.A. came into force. Para 3.1 provides as under:

"Categories and Grades of the Services."

3.1 The Technical Services are grouped into three categories consisting of the following grades:

Category Grade Pay Scale

Category-I (T-I) (i) Rs. 260-6-290-EB-6-326-8-366-EB-8-390-10-430

( T-2) (ii) Rs. 330-10-380-EB-12-500-EB-15-560

(T-I-3) (iii) Rs. 425-15-500-EB- 15-560-20-700

Category-II (T-II-3) (i) Rs. 425-15-5-EB-15-560-20-700

(T-4) (ii) Rs.550-25-750-EB-30-900

(T-5) (iii) Rs. 650-3-740-35-810-EB-35-880-40-1000 - EB-40-1200

Category-III (T-6) (i) Rs.700-40-900-EB-40-1100-50-1300

(T-7) (ii) Rs.1100-50-1600

(T-8) (iii) Rs.1300-50-1700

(T-9) (iv) Rs.1500-60-1800-100-2000"

The next relevant paras for the purpose of this case are paras 3.2,3.3and 5.1 which read as follows:

"3.2. The pay scales in Categories I and II replace the existing pay scale in the manner indicated in Appendix I. The new pay scales in Categories III are the existing pay scales.

3.3 The new pay scales will be applicable both to the future entrants as well as to the existing incumbents from 1-10-1975. However, the existing incumbents may, if they so desire, retain their existing scales as personal to them.

XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX

Initial Adjusment of Existing Employees

5.1 The existing permanent and temporary employees appointed through regularly constituted D.P.C./Selection Committees will be fitted into the grades specified in para 3.1 on"point to point basis" without any further screening irrespective of their qualifications, However, persons holding positions in the merged grade of Rs. 425-700 and possesing qualifications prescribed for Category II, will be fitted in Grade T-II-3 (Rs. 425-700)."

As per these rules the respondent was inducted into Category I Grade T-2 and as seen above the scale of pay for the persons holding post in Category I Grade T-2 was fixed at Rs. 330-560. The respondent made a representation that as per the rules he ought to have been fitted in the lowest grade of Category II i.e., T-II-3 for which the scale of pay prescribed is Rs. 425-700 and also that a Field/Farm Technician holding either a 3 years diploma or a bachelors degree in the relevant field should be fitted in Category II. As the representation was not fruitful he filed a writ application in the High Court of Orissa which after the establishment of the Central Administrative Tribunal was transferred to Cuttack Bench.In the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of C.R.R.I. it was stated that the respondent was correctly indutced into Category I, Grade T-2 and that as per the provisions of Rule 5.1 the existing permanent and temporary employees will be fitted only in the grades specified in para 3.1 on point to point basis without any further screening irrespective of the qualification. It is, however
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top