KULDIP SINGH, S.MOHAN
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Anand Kumar Pandey – Respondent
JUDGMENT
KULDIP SINGH, J.:- Special leave granted.
2. The Railway Recruitment Board, Patna held written examination followed by viva voce test for selection and recruitment to various posts of non-technical popular categories in the Eastern Railway. A panel of selected candidates was prepared and published. Meanwhile in an investigation, conducted on a complaint received by the railway authorities, it was found that unfair means were adopted by the candidates at centre No. 115 (Katihar). The question for consideration before the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) was whether in such a situation the railway authorities could cancel the selection and empanelment of the candidates from centre No. 115 and direct them to sit in the written examination again? If so could it be done without complying with the rules of natural justice? The Tribunal answered the question in the negative and quashed the order of the railway authorities calling upon the candidates to sit in the written examination once over again. This appeal by way of special leave is against the judgment of the Tribunal.
3. The Railway Recruitment Board, Patna invited applications for selection and recruitment to vari
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.