SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 655

KULDIP SINGH, S.MOHAN
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Anand Kumar Pandey – Respondent


Advocates:
A.S.BHASME, Altaf Ahmed, D.P.MUKHERJI, TAPAS RAY, V.K.VARMA

JUDGMENT

KULDIP SINGH, J.:- Special leave granted.

2. The Railway Recruitment Board, Patna held written examination followed by viva voce test for selection and recruitment to various posts of non-technical popular categories in the Eastern Railway. A panel of selected candidates was prepared and published. Meanwhile in an investigation, conducted on a complaint received by the railway authorities, it was found that unfair means were adopted by the candidates at centre No. 115 (Katihar). The question for consideration before the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) was whether in such a situation the railway authorities could cancel the selection and empanelment of the candidates from centre No. 115 and direct them to sit in the written examination again? If so could it be done without complying with the rules of natural justice? The Tribunal answered the question in the negative and quashed the order of the railway authorities calling upon the candidates to sit in the written examination once over again. This appeal by way of special leave is against the judgment of the Tribunal.

3. The Railway Recruitment Board, Patna invited applications for selection and recruitment to vari














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top