B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, S.B.MAJMUDAR
Ashok Kumar: Ram Kishan Nanda – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory Chandigarh: Chandigarh Administration – Respondent
JUDGMENT
MAJMUDAR, J.:- Leave granted.
2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties in support of their respective cases. The appellants are the original writ-petitioners who filed two Writ petitions in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The appellants are handicapped person.Appellant in civil appeal No.7565/94 arising out S.L.P. (C)No. 12861 of 1994 is also a 1984-riot victim. Both of them were granted licences under Section 4 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 to operate Angeleems type pay phone .(PCO) by the Commercial Officer, Telephones, Chandigarh.These licences were granted to them for five years.On the basis of those licences, the appellants applied to the Administrator, Union Territory, Chandigarh for being allotted suitable sites on the bus-stand at Chandigarh, where the PCO booths were to be located . Both of them were allotted suitable sites for one year each. So far as the appellant in civil appeal No. 7565/94 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 12861 of 1994 is concerned, he was allotted a site measuring 8x 8 Ft. on 19-1-1993 at the rent of Rs.200/-p.m for a period of one year. So far as the appellant in the second appeal is concerned,he was initially all
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.