SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 901

R.M.SAHAI, N.P.SINGH
State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Hem Raj – Respondent


JUDGMENT

 In Civil Appeals Nos. 936, 938-39, 941, 943, 944, 946, 948, 950-51, 953, 960, 962-69, 971, 974, 976 and 978 the controversy raised stands concluded by the decision of this Court in State of Punjab v. Mulkh Raj & Co., (1977) 3 SCC 582. The dispute was whether shortfall in the excise dues could be recovered from the contractor. A Full Bench of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in Mulkh Raj Krishan Kumar v. State of Punjab, (1972) 74 Pun LR 698, held in favour of the contractors and quashed the demand notice. Following the Full Bench decision, the High Court quashed notice in these petitions as well. Since the Full Bench decision has been reversed by this Court, the order of the High Court cannot be maintained.

2. The appeals are allowed. The order of the High Court is set aside. The writ petition of the respondent in the High Court shall stand dismissed. But the parties shall bear their own costs.

Appeals allowed.

For Citation: AIR 1995 SC 604

Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top