SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 290

KULDIP SINGH, YOGESHWAR DAYAL
Srinivasa Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


ORDER

The appellants were working as Hereditary Village Accountants in Gulbarga District of the State of Karnataka. As a consequence of the coming into force of the Mysore Village Offices Abolition Act, 1961, the office of the hereditary accountant was abolished. The appellants were, however, permitted to continue in their respective offices till the time fresh appointments were made to the posts of Village Accountants. Thereafter, fresh recruitment was made but the appellants were not selected. The appellants challenged the fresh selection by way of writ petitions under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India before the Karnataka High Court. A learned single Judge of the High Court dismissed the writ petitions. Writ Appeals 1864-65/80 arising out of W.P. Nos 5034/77 and 5615/77 were heard by a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court and the Bench by its judgment dt. Nov 21, 1980 dismissed the writ appeals on the following reasoning:

"In these appeals, the only contention urged by Sri B.G. Sridharan, learned counsel for the appellants-petitioners, was that under the proviso to R. 10 of the Karnataka General Services (Revenue Subordinate Branch) Village Accountants (Cadre and Recruit



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top