SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 64

K.RAMASWAMY, SUHAS C.SEN
P. L. Kantha Rao – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
H.S.GURU RAJ RAO, S.MURALIDHARAN, Seshagiri Rao

ORDER

This petition is filed against the order of single Judge of the High Court of Andhra Predesh, dated 15-6-94, made in CRP No. 3708/93. The petitioners filed R. P. No. 986/84 in the A. P. Administrative Tribunal constituted under the Presidential Order 1985, pursuant to the power under Article 371-D. The Tribunal by its order dated March 19, 1986, allowed their petition. For its implementation the petitioners filed a writ petition in the High Court in which by order dated 6-3-1987 the High Court directed to approach the Administrative Tribunal to seek an order under para 8(5) of the Presidential Order for its enforcement. On obtaining the certificate from the Tribunal on March 9, 1987, the petitioners filed E. P. No. 8/89 in the Court of Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. When the Chief Judge directed its implementation, the order in the execution came to be challenged in the High Court. The learned single Judge in the impugned order held that under S. 29 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 (for short, the Act), the execution is by way of a proceeding and that, therefore, Sections 29 and 29-A of the Act get attracted. It was also held that as the present A. P. Admi







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top