SUJATA V.MANOHAR, K.RAMASWAMY
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Shivkumar Bhargava – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This appeal by Special Leave arises from the judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 21-2-1985 made in L.P.A. No. 26 of 1985 dismissing the appeal in limine as barred by limitation.
2. The respondent filed the Writ Petition which came up before the learned single Judge claiming alternative site on the ground that his land has been acquired for public purpose and that, therefore, he is entitled to the benefit under the policy of the Government. The appellant have denied the right. The single Judge found that though the respondent was not the owner on the date when the Notification under S. 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act was published but as on the date when the acquisition was finalised he became the owner by virtue of purchase and that therefore he is entitled to allotment of alternative site. The Division Bench dismissed the appeal on the ground of delay. This Court has condoned the delay and admitted the appeal.
3. The question for consideration is whether the respondent is entitled to alternative site. The Notification under S. 4(1) of the Act was published on June 29, 1966. In the S.L.P. it was specifically stated that in spite of giving opportunities to the respondent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.