SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 83

SUJATA V.MANOHAR, K.RAMASWAMY
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Shivkumar Bhargava – Respondent


Advocates:
C.V.SUBBA RAO, N.N.GOSWAMY, N.S.BISHT, Niranjana Singh, V.B.SAHARYA

JUDGMENT

 This appeal by Special Leave arises from the judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 21-2-1985 made in L.P.A. No. 26 of 1985 dismissing the appeal in limine as barred by limitation.

2. The respondent filed the Writ Petition which came up before the learned single Judge claiming alternative site on the ground that his land has been acquired for public purpose and that, therefore, he is entitled to the benefit under the policy of the Government. The appellant have denied the right. The single Judge found that though the respondent was not the owner on the date when the Notification under S. 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act was published but as on the date when the acquisition was finalised he became the owner by virtue of purchase and that therefore he is entitled to allotment of alternative site. The Division Bench dismissed the appeal on the ground of delay. This Court has condoned the delay and admitted the appeal.

3. The question for consideration is whether the respondent is entitled to alternative site. The Notification under S. 4(1) of the Act was published on June 29, 1966. In the S.L.P. it was specifically stated that in spite of giving opportunities to the respondent




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top