SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 1295

FAIZAN UDDIN, S.C.AGRAWAL
State Of Orissa – Appellant
Versus
Radheyshyammeher – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.PANDEY, B.PARTHASARTHY

JUDGMENT

FAIZAN UDDIN, J. :- Leave granted.

2. The short question that arises for our consideration in this appeal is whether the impugned order of the High Court of Orissa dated 27-9-93 passed in O.J.C. No. 5435/93 directing the appellants not to take any decision on the advertisement dated 27-7-93 issued by the Superintendent C.D.M.O., Bolangir to settle the shop with any one to hold a medical store inside the hospital premises, Patnagarh could be sustained in the absence of any material to show that the said decision of the Government is arbitrary or opposed to any rule or regulations in that behalf.

3. The brief facts leading to this appeal under Art. 136 of the Constitution are that the State Government of Orissa with a view to streamline the existing procedure for opening of 24 hours medical stores in the college, hospitals, etc. and in supersession of previous instructions took a decision that 24 hours medical stores shall be opened in the campus of the hospital which shall remain open for all the 24 hours with a view to make the medicines available to the patients at competitive price. Consequently, a memo dated 13-5-93 was issued to all the D.M.E.T./D.H.S./D.C. and all Super






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top