SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 69

SUHAS C.SEN, K.RAMASWAMY
State of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
Korrapati Subrahmanyam – Respondent


Advocates:
G.Prabhakar, V.G.PRAGASAM

JUDGMENT

 Mr. V.G. Pragasam, learned counsel for the respondents, states that though on the last occasion he had undertaken to file Vakalatnama for respondents Nos.1 and 6, despite his best efforts, he could not contact them and obtain instructions for filing vakalat. Therefore, we deem that respondents Nos. 1 and 6 are not interested in contesting the matter. They are set ex-parte.

2. Leave granted.

3. On the intervening night of February 14 and 15, 1978, the lorry - APD 3156, was being loaded with 28 logs of red-sander wood at tri-junction road, one mile away from Sanipaya near Marrimanu in Cuddapah District of Andhra Pradesh State. The officers of the forest department, who were in watch, proceeded to the place and seized the 28 sander-wood logs loaded in the lorry under a Panchnama-Ex.P8. They also seized 118 logs which were kept on the road side for being loaded into the lorry. The statement of the accused 2 to 7 who were apprehended on the spot, were recorded under Exs. P1 to P7. The lorry trip sheet Ex.P-19 was also seized. Thereafter, they were charged for the offence under S.20 read with S.29 of the A.P. Forest Act, 1967, (for short the Act) read with Rule 3 of the A.P. Sand







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top