JUDGMENT

R.M. SAHAI, J:—The question of law that arises for consideration in this appeal directed against order of Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Bombay Bench, is whether the appellant who was appointed temporarily against a permanent post was entitled to be regularised under Temporary Government Servants Extension of Permanency Resolution issued by the State Government in 1975 or under any other equitable principle as she had been working continuously since then and had worked for nine years, without break on the date the Government advertised the post to be filled through Public Service Commission.

2. Few dates and facts which are more or less undisputed may be narrated in brief. The appellant, a Bachelor in Dental Surgery (B.D.S.) was selected by the Divisional Selection Board and was appointed as Lecturer in Dentistry in Government B.J. Medical College, Pune on 16th September, 1978. In the appointment letter it was mentioned that the appellant was appointed, on a purely temporary basis pending further orders as Lecturer in Dentistry at the B. J. Medical College, Pune from date of taking over charge.......... The letter further mentioned that the appointment of the appellan