SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 953

KULDIP SINGH, N.P.SINGH, P.B.SAWANT
Indian Express Newspapers Private LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
A.G.Ratnaparkhi, A.L.TREHAN, A.R.ATREY, ANIL KATIYAR, ANIS SUHRAVARDY, APARNA ROHATGI, ARUN JAITLEY, ARVINDER CHOUDHARY, B.DUTTA, B.K.PAL, B.M.SRIVASTAVA, BINA GUPTA, C.N.SRI KUMAR, C.RAMAMURTHY, D.A.DAVE, F.S.NARIMAN, G.RAMASVAMY, Gaurav Agrawal, GUNVANT DARA, INDIRA JAISINGH, JAGDISH PRASAD, JITENDRA SHARMA, K.J.JOHN, K.VIJAYA KUMAR, KARANJAWALA, M.N.SHROFF, MADAM PHADNIS, MADAN LOKUR, MINAKSHI GAUTAM, Mukul Mudgal, Niranjana Singh, OM PRAKASH KHAITAN, P.Gaur, P.K.CHAKRAVARTI, P.K.MULLICK, P.R.SITHARAMAN, PRAMOD AGARWAL, R. KARANJAVALA, R.N.TRIVEDI, R.P.KAPUR, R.VAIGAI, RAJU RAMACHANDRAN, RAKESH BAJPAI, RIMA BHANDARI, RUBY SINGH AHUJA, S.K.JAIN, S.SUKUMARAN, SARVA M.MITTER, Satyapal Khushal Chand, SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SUDHIR GUPTA, SUMAN JYOTI KHAITAN, SURUCHI AGARWAL, SURYA KANT SHARMA, URMILA SIRUR, V.A.BOBDE, V.C.MAHAJAN, V.D.KHANNA, V.G.PRAGASAM, V.R.REDDY, VIJAY LAKSHMI MENON, Vivek Sharma

JUDGMENT

SAWANT, J :—In all these matters, the petitioner-establishment have challenged two orders viz, Nos. 683(E) and 684(E), both dated 31-8-1989, (hereinafter referred to as Orders) issued by the Central Government under Section 11 of the Working Journalists and other Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) accepting and giving effect to the recommendations of the Wage Board Report dated 26-5-1989 (hereinafter referred to as the Report ) on various grounds. Order No. 683 (E) deals with wage-scales and grades, and Order No. 684 (E) deals with House Rent Allowance and City Compensatory Allowance. The Wage Board was constituted by the respondent 1-Union Government in 1985 under the chairmanship of Shri Bachawat and hence the Report given by it is known as Bachawat Award. Both the orders are challenged on the ground of violation of the fundamental rights under Articles 14,19(1) (a) and (1)(g) of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners also challenge the amendment of Sections 2 (d) and 10 (4) of the Act brought about by Sections 2 (i) and 3 of Working Journalists and Other Newspaper Employees (Constit






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top