SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 1247

S.C.AGRAWAL, FAIZAN UDDIN
Anirudhpandey – Appellant
Versus
Bihar State Road Transport Corporation – Respondent


Advocates:
AMARENDRA SARAN, Krishnanand Pandey, RANJAN MUKHERJEE, RANJIT GHOSAL, S.B.SANYAL

JUDGMENT

S.C. AGRAWAL, J. :—Leave granted.

2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. Anirudh Pandey, the appellant herein, was employed with the Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, respondent No.1 (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation). While he was thus employed, he was allotted House No.327/2-2 on Road No.26 at Adityapur Colony in Jamshedpur on June 7, 1970. The said house belongs to the Bihar State Housing Board (hereinafter referred to as the Board). The appellant retired on attaining the age of superannuation on January 31, 1992. Since he was not paid his post-retiral benefits, viz., provident fund, gratuity, etc. by the Corporation he filed a writ petition (C.W.J.C. No. 3038/92) in the Patna High Court . The said writ petition was contested by the Corporation.The stand of the Corporation was that the appellant had not vacated the house which was allotted to him while he was in service of the Corporation and that the Corporation was ready to pay all the legal dues of the appellant after he vacates the said quarter. The writ petition was disposed of by the High Court by order dated April 21,1993 on the view that unless the house was vacated by the appellant






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top