SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 1269

K.RAMASWAMY, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
State Of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Novelty Store – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The orders of the High Court in the impugned appeals are to be set aside on the sole ground that the respondents after paying octroi duty have passed on the burden to the consumers and collected from the customers on the cloth purchased and sold by them. Therefore the order of refund would be an unjust enrichment for them. This Court has repeatedly held that such a refund should not be ordered. In that view of the matter without expressing any opinion on the merits during the interregnum Gram Panchayat was entitled to the refund of the amount which is already collected and passed on the burden to the consumers these appeals are to be allowed. The appeals are accordingly allowed and the writ petitions in the High Court stand dismissed.

Order accordingly.

For Citation: AIR 1995 SC 1132

Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top