SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 404

S.B.MAJMUDAR, R.M.SAHAI
Cantonment Board, Secunderabad – Appellant
Versus
G. Venketram Reddy – Respondent


Advocates:
A.Singh, C.MARKANDEV, H.P.SHARMA, P.Rao, S.Markandaya

JUDGMENT

The question of law that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether a Municipal Corporation established under an Act is, any Municipality in the State within the meaning of Section 60 of the Cantonment Act, 1924 (hereinafter referred as the Act).

2. It is the answer to this question that would determine the jurisdiction and power of the Cantonment Board of Secunderabad (in brief the Board) to levy and collect octroi on substitute of ghee and all kinds of food and drinks brought inside the cantonment for use, consumption and sale. The challenge to the levy was upheld by the learned single Judge as there was no machinery provided for the assessment of octroi. It was held that the provision for appeal against any imposition under Section 84 of the Act did not remove the infirmity as in absence of any provision for assessment the right of appeal was illusory and non-existent. In appeal filed by the Board before the Division Bench under Letters Patent the order of the learned single Judge was maintained as there was no power to levy any octroi. It was held that Section 60 of the Act empowered the Board to levy any tax which under any enactment for the time being in force














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top