SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 7

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
M. P. Electricity Board, Rampur – Appellant
Versus
Central India Electric Supply Company LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
G.L.SANGHI, HARISH N.SLAVE, R.K.Khanna, S.K.Gambhir, SURYA KANT SHARMA

JUDGMENT

B. P. JEEVAN REDDY, J.:—Leave granted. Heard counsel for the parties.

2. This appeal is preferred against the Judgment of a learned single Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissing the Civil Revision Petition filed by the appellant. The Civil Revision Petition was preferred against the Judgment of the Third Additional District Judge of the Court of District Judge, Bilaspur in Execution Case No. 17-A of 1970 whereunder the learned Judge had allowed the application filed by the respondent-judgment-debtor.

3. The appellant-decree-holder, Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board, is a statutory corporation constituted under Section 5 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910. The Government of Madhya Pradesh had granted a licence to the respondent under the said Act for generating and supplying electricity to consumers at Bilaspur. The appellant exercised the option of purchasing the respondent undertaking on 15-1-1968 and 5-4-1964 as provided by Section 6 of the Act. Accordingly, the possession of the undertaking was delivered to the appellant but while doing so, the respondent did not deliver possession of properties described in Schedule-I and Schedule II to the plaint. The appel










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top