SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 437

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
KULDIP SINGH AND B.L. HANSARIA, JJ.
State of Karnataka, Appellant
Versus
Kumari Gowri Narayana Ambiga etc., Respondent.
Civil Appeal Nos. 615 to 620 of 1979, (with C.A. Nos. 2670 of 1989, 120-122 of 1988 and 3813 of 1990)
Decided on 27-3-1995.

Advocates:
M.VIRAPPA, Navin Singh, P.Mahale, P.R.RAMASESHESH.S.PARIHARHAR, S.SIVA SUBRAMANIAM

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Article 335 - Civil Services (General Recruitment) Rules, 1957 - Scheduled Tribes for appointments - Appointment of local candidates - Court may briefly state necessary facts- Karnataka Civil Services Rules define local candidate to mean a temporary Government servant not appointed regularly Rules of Recruitment to that service- local candidates appointed from time to time subject to their possessing prescribed qualifications were State Government either by way of executive orders by framing Rules Article Constitution of India- By Office Memorandum State Government ordered that no further appointments local candidates be made- Later on by Office Memorandum dated embargo was relaxed in respect Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes for appointments - Office Memorandum further provided that 3% of vacancies be filled up by appointing local candidates belonging to Backward Tribes- Following these orders a large number of local candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes and Backward Tribes were appointed –Held, Special Rules for recruitment of local candidates- Their initial appointment as local candidates was admittedly not in accordance with procedure prescribed by aforesaid rules of recruitment- assurance of efficiency implicit in competitive selection thus became first casualty- These irregular candidates are now sought to be regularly recruited without a chance put efficiency-standard to any test whatsoever argument that this would seriously impair standard efficiency of administration and would weaken ramparts against inefficiency in public service cannot be rejected- candidates may have minimum educational qualification prescribed for post but that only satisfies eligibility test and not suitability test- basic eligibility is quite distinct and different from suitability- Suitability could be considered only by competitive test with an application of same yardstick to all candidates with a prescription of minimum standard- purpose every competitive examination must be select worthiest person- interview or examination must be held for assessment of candidates competence proficiency and attainment and in other words measure merit- Only those persons who possess required standard of excellence assessed on no other basis than their performance in examination or interview prescribed in that behalf can be considered to be suitable Court while granting special leave stayed operation of impugned judgment of High Court- Since court are upholding High Court judgment it would be necessary for us to protect rights of Scheduled Caste Scheduled Tribe and Backward Tribe candidates who have been appointed during pendency of these appeals- Keeping in view facts and circumstances of this case court direct that High Court judgment as upheld by this Court shall be operative prospectively from date of this judgment Appeals dismissed

JUDGMENT

KULDIP SINGH, J. :—These appeals are directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court declaring the Karnataka State Civil Services (Direct Recruitment of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Tribes to Class III Posts) (Special) Rules, 1977 (the Special Rules) as violative of Article 16(1) read with Article 335 of the Constitution of India. This Court while granting special leave on March 9, 1979 stayed the operation of the impugned judgment of the High Court.

2. We may briefly state the necessary facts. The Karnataka Civil Services Rules define local candidate to mean a temporary Government servant not appointed regularly as per Rules of Recruitment to that service. The local candidates appointed from time to time, subject to their possessing the prescribed qualifications were regularised by the State Government either by way of executive orders, or by framing Rules under Article 309 of the Constitution of India. By the Office Memorandum dated May 23, 1973 the State Government ordered that no further appointments of local candidates be made. Later on by Office Memorandum dated June 13, 1974 the embargo was relaxed in respect of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes for appointments to Class III posts. The Office Memorandum dated December 19, 1975 further provided that 3% of the vacancies be filled up by appointing local candidates belonging to Backward Tribes. Following these orders, a large number of local candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Tribes were appointed. It is not disputed that despite prohibition, candidates from other categories were also appointed as local candidates. The local candidates were given opportunity to apply to the Public Service Commission/Departmental Recruitment Committees for recruitment to Class III cadres in the State services. Those rejected by the Commission/ Committees and those who did not apply were liable to be terminated from the posts held by them as local candidates. On February 1, 1977, the Government, however, directed the continuance of such local candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Tribes in service, till further orders.

3. On February 25, 1977 the Special Rules were framed under Article 309 of the Constitution of India. Rule 2(b) of the Special Rules which defines local candidate is as under :

"Local candidate means any person belonging to any of the Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes as defined in the Constitution of India or Backward Tribes specified in Annexure-I to the Government Order No. BGAD 2 SBC 75 dated 9th July, 1975 and appointed to any of the categories of Class-III posts by an appointing authority by direct recruitment otherwise than in accordance with rule 4 of the Karnataka State Civil Services (General Recruitment) Rules, 1957, or the Special Rules of recruitment applicable to such posts, but does not include any person, -

(i) selected by the Karnataka Public Service Commission or a Recruitment Committee or any other Selecting Authority and appointed to and assumed charge of any such post in pursuance of such selection; or

(ii) appointed temporarily for a fixed period or for any item of work; or

(iii) whose services have been terminated due to resignation or under the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957."

Rule 3 of the Special Rules states that notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any other Rules relating to recruitment to any of the categories of Class III posts, direct recruitment to Class III posts in State Civil Services shall be made by the appointing authority concerned in accordance with the Special Rules by the appointment of such local candidates who were not disqualified by the provisions of the Karnataka State Civil Services (General Recruitment) Rules, 1957, on the date of entry into service. Rule 4 provides that Class III posts which were left over after the appointment of r




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top