SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 437

KULDIP SINGH, B.L.HANSARIA
State of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
Gowri Narayana Ambiga – Respondent


Advocates:
M.VIRAPPA, Navin Singh, P.Mahale, P.R.RAMASESHESH.S.PARIHARHAR, S.SIVA SUBRAMANIAM

JUDGMENT

KULDIP SINGH, J. :—These appeals are directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court declaring the Karnataka State Civil Services (Direct Recruitment of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Tribes to Class III Posts) (Special) Rules, 1977 (the Special Rules) as violative of Article 16(1) read with Article 335 of the Constitution of India. This Court while granting special leave on March 9, 1979 stayed the operation of the impugned judgment of the High Court.

2. We may briefly state the necessary facts. The Karnataka Civil Services Rules define local candidate to mean a temporary Government servant not appointed regularly as per Rules of Recruitment to that service. The local candidates appointed from time to time, subject to their possessing the prescribed qualifications were regularised by the State Government either by way of executive orders, or by framing Rules under Article 309 of the Constitution of India. By the Office Memorandum dated May 23, 1973 the State Government ordered that no further appointments of local candidates be made. Later on by Office Memorandum dated June 13, 1974 the embargo was relaxed in respect of the


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top