P.B.SAWANT, S.B.MAJMUDAR
Rashmi Srivastava: B. D. Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
Vikram University – Respondent
JUDGMENT
MAJMUDAR, J. :—These two civil appeals arise out of a common judgment rendered by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Indore Bench on 23rd February, 1994. The High Court allowed two writ petitions against Vikram University and other contesting respondents. The contesting respondents after obtaining special leave to appeal from this Court have challenged the said common judgment of the High Court in these civil appeals.
2. A common question is involved in these appeals, namely, whether the University teachers who have been given merit promotion as Readers or Professors, as the case may be, can claim seniority over directly recruited Readers and Professors on the ground of continuous officiation in service as Readers or Professors. The High Court has taken the view that they are not entitled to claim such seniority and has accordingly allowed the writ petitions moved by the directly appointed Readers and Professors. The appellants before us are the promotee Readers and Professors under the merit promotion scheme.
Factual backdrop :
3. In order to appreciate the grievance voiced by the appellants, it is necessary to have a look at the relevant introductory facts leading to these p
distinguished : Bal Krishna Agarwal (Dr) v. State of U.P
referred to : S.B. Patwardhan v. State of Maharashtra
Direct Recruit Class II Engineering Officers Assn. v. State of Maharashtra
Vinay Kumar Verma v. State of Bihar
University of Delhi v. Raj Singh
Col. A.S. Iyer v. V. Balasubramanyam
Paradise Printers v. Union Territory of Chandigarh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.