SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 396

K.RAMASWAMY, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH, S.SAGHIR AHMAD
Kartar Singh Alias Niranjan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
G.K.BANSAL, Uma Datta

JUDGMENT  

Leave granted.

2. For the lands of the appellants acquired by the notification under S. 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, published on October 15, 1971, the Land Acquisition Collector, in his award dated January 24, 1973, awarded a sum of Rs. 1,30,949.30/-. On reference, the Addl. District Judge, by his award and decree dated August 27, 1975, enhanced the compensation at the rate of Rs. 300/- per marla but, on appeal by the respondent in R.F.A. No. 15/1976, it was reduced to Rs. 255/- per marla. Pending appeal, the appellants had executed and recovered the enhanced compensation with interest on May 27, 1976. The State, therefore, filed an application under S. 144, C.P.C. on February 28, 1983 for restitution of the excess amount with interest payable thereon. The appellant had deposited principal excess amount of Rs. 57,920.26 on February 21, 1985. The District Judge by his order dated March 15, 1985 while upholding restitution of the excess amount, disallowed interest payable thereon. On appeal, the High Court, by the impugned order in Execution F.A. No. 1374/85 dated November 5, 1985 (reported in AIR 1986 Punj. & Har. 312) directed the appellants to pay interest. Thus thi






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top