SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 356

K.RAMASWAMY, B.L.HANSARIA
S. Rangaraju Naidu – Appellant
Versus
S. Thiruvarakkarasu – Respondent


Advocates:
K.R.CHOUDHARY, M.N.KRISHNA MANI, T.Raja

JUDGMENT

The appeal by special leave arises from the judgment and decree in Second Appeal No. 197 / 86, dated April 21, 1986 passed by the single Judge of the Madras High Court. The facts are very simple. The respondent had filed three suits : O. S. Nos. 27 / 63 and 53 / 63 by him and O. S. No. 32 / 63 by his brother Sathappa Chettiar, in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Selam, to recover certain amounts taken by the appellant from the respondent and his brother. The decretal amounts due thereon were made up of a total sum of Rs. 35,500/- which after payment of Rs. 20,000/-, came to Rs. 15,500/-. Therefore, on December 30, 1977, the appellant executed a promissory note, Ex. A-1 for the payment of Rs. 15,000/- inclusive of interest @ 9% per annum. On the same day, the appellant had also executed an agreement of sale, for the discharge of the very same promissory note debt, and since he was not in a position to pay the same, he agreed to sell three plots of land of an extent of 7,500 sq. ft. for the same consideration, i.e., Rs. 15,500/-. Since the appellant had not executed the sale deed, the respondent filed the civil suit in the Court of Subordinate Judge for specific performanc






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top