SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 673

M.N.VENKATACHALIAH, S.SAGHIR AHMAD, KULDIP SINGH
Vidya Devi Alias Vidya Vati – Appellant
Versus
Prem Prakash – Respondent


Advocates:
AVADH BIHARI ROHTAGI, CHAMAN LAL ITORORA, P.H.Parekh, R.D.MALHOTRA, R.F.NARIMAN, S.FAZI, Uma Datta

Judgement Key Points

Based on the provided legal document, there is no indication that a suit for recovery was filed. The document primarily discusses a suit for partition of a co-bhumidhar's share in a holding and the legal issues related to title, adverse possession, and jurisdiction under the Land Reforms Act. The focus is on partition proceedings initiated before a Revenue Assistant and the related legal questions, rather than a suit for recovery of possession or recovery of debt or other claims. Therefore, it can be concluded that a suit for recovery was not filed in this case.


JUDGMENT

VENKATACHALA, J—(On behalf of himself and Kuldip Singh, J.):- Raghunath who had lands comprised in Khasra Nos. 2, 5/1 and 6/1 situated in village Madangir, Delhi, as his holding died in the year 1952 leaving behind Vidya Devi alias Vidya Vati, widow of his predeceased first son Ram Narain, his second son Dev Raj and his third son Prem Prakash, as his legal heirs to inherit his holding. When in the year 1953-54 a jamabandi of that village was held, entry in the revenue records pertaining to the said holding was changed from the name of Raghunath to the names of Vidya Devi, Dev Raj and Prem Prakash. With the coming into force of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954- the Act, respecting the area of the lands within which the said holding fell, a declaration having been made is required under that Act and the Rules made thereunder on 1st February, 1958 that the said Vidya Devi alias Vidya Vati, Dev Raj and Prem Prakash were the co-bhumidhars of that holding, they became the co-bhumidhars each entitled to one -third share thereof.

2. However, on 9th October, 1975 Vidya Devi, filed a suit as plaintiff therein for partition of her one-third share and separate possession in the said ho



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top