SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 592

B.L.HANSARIA, K.RAMASWAMY
Preeti Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sandeep Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Petition under Section 13(B)(1) & (2), of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 for a decree of divorce by mutual consent duly signed by both the parties is taken on record.

2. As per the directions of this Court by order dated October 21, 1994, the parties have filed the petition for mutual divorce. In terms of the order, the marriage of the petitioner and the respondent stands dissolved and the divorce takes effect from today. In terms of the compromise all the proceedings instituted by either party in any Court or before any authority stand withdrawn and dismissed.

3. In terms of the order passed by this Court earlier, amount of Rs. 1.25 lakhs in addition to Rs. 30,000/- were deposited by the respondent in the name of daughter Approva. The said amount shall remain in the name of minor till she attains majority. The respondent has also paid Rs. 1.5 lakhs to the petitioner.

4. It is brought to our notice that the respondent had not given to the petitioner 2000 Units of Seven Years Monthly Income Unit with Bonus and Growth, 1990 (II) (Cumulative Growth) valued at Rs. 20,000/- deposited on December 31, 1990 which would mature on December 16, 1997. While the respondent has handed over a



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top