SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 472

G.T.NANAVATI, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY
Commissioner Of Wealth Tax, Calcutta – Appellant
Versus
U. C. Mehatab – Respondent


JUDGMENT

 These appeals are preferred against a common judgment of the Calcutta High Court in three reference made under Section 27 of the Wealth Tax Act. The assessment years concerned herein are 1957-58, 1958-59 and 1959-60. The respondent-assessee was the holder of an estate which was acquired under the West Bengal Estate Acquisition Act, 1953. In the proceedings under the Wealth Tax Act, the respondents right to receive compensation under the said Act was treated as an asset within the meaning of the Wealth Tax Act and its value included in his total wealth. On appeal, the Appellate Assistant commissioner merely reduced the value. On further appeal, the Tribunal held in favour of the assessee, but at the instance of Revenue, it referred the following question for the opinion of the High Court under Section 27(1) :

"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee had no right on the relevant valuation dates to receive any compensation for the acquisition of his estate from the Government of West Bengal?"

2. While referring the question, the Tribunal observed:

"If the question above is answered by the Court in favour o











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top