SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 292

A.S.ANAND, M.K.MUKHERJEE
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Kumar Mitra – Respondent


Advocates:
AMIAN GHOSH, NAVIN PRAKASH, P.PARMESHVARAN, SHANKAR GOPAL PAGIRE, VENUGOPAL REDDY

JUDGMENT

ANAND, J. :—Leave granted.

2. The only question that we are called upon to consider in these appeals is whether the employees of a nationalised Bank can be held to be public servants within the meaning of Section 21 of Indian Penal Code and triable by Special Courts for the offences triable by those Courts. The question arises in the following circumstances.

3. The respondent was the Branch Manager of Bank of India at the relevant time. A case was registered against him and another person for offences under Sections 120B, 420, 409, 467, 468, 471, and 477A IPC and Section 5(2) read with Section 5(1) (c) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. After completion of investigation by the CBI, charge-sheet was filed in the Court of the Special Judge at Alipur. Calcutta on 4-12-85. Cognizance was taken but before charges were framed, the respondent moved a petition for his discharge before the Special Judge stating the he is not a public servant and therefore cannot be tried by the Special Court. The learned Special Judge by his order dated 28-6-91 rejected the application. The respondent thereupon filed a criminal revision in the Calcutta High Court seeking quashing of the





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top