SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 458

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.C. AGRAWAL, B.L. HANSARIA AND Mrs. SUJATA V. MANOHAR, JJ.
Sumati Dayal, Appellant v. Commissioner of Income-tax Bangalore, Respondent.
Civil Appeals Nos. 1244-45 of 1977
Decided on 28-3-1995.

Headnote:

Finance Act, 1972 - Section 2(24) - Income-tax Act, 1961 - Section 245M(2) - Commissioner of Income-tax - Enquiry - Appellant carries on business as a dealer in art pieces antiques and curios at Bangalore- During assessment appellant received a total amount by way of race winnings in Jackpots and Treble events in races at Turf Clubs in Bangalore Madras and Hyderabad- said amount was shown by appellant in capital account in books appellant filed a return declaring an income appellant also made a sworn statement before Income-tax Officer and on basis said statement Income-tax Officer made an assessment order wherein he held that sum of is not winnings in races and he treated said receipts as income from undisclosed sources and assessed same as income from other sources- For assessment appellant showed receipts as race winnings in two Jackpots at Bangalore and Madras and said amount was credited in capital account in books appellant filed a return declaring an income - In his assessment order Income-tax Officer included amount as income from other sources and assessed income of appellant that basis appeals filed by appellant against two assessment orders were disposed of by Appellate Assistant Commissioner by order whereby assessment of Rupees as income under head other sources for assessment –Held Commission that "fraudulent sale of winning ticket is not an usual practice but is very much of an unusual practice" ignores prevalent malpractice that was noticed by Direct Taxes Enquiry Committee and recommendations made by said Committee which led to amendment Act by Finance Act whereby exemption from tax that was available in respect of winnings from lotteries cross-word puzzles races etc- was withdrawn- Similarly observation by Chairman that if it is alleged that these tickets were obtained through fraudulent means it is upon alleger to prove that it is so ignores reality- transaction about purchase of winning ticket takes place in secret and direct evidence about such purchase would be rarely available- An inference about such a purchase has to be drawn on basis of circumstances available on record- Having regard to conduct of appellant as disclosed in her sworn statement as well as other material on record an inference could reasonably be drawn that winning tickets were purchased by appellant after event- Court are therefore unable to agree with view of Chairman in his dissenting opinion- In our opinion majority opinion after considering surrounding circumstances and applying test of human probabilities has rightly concluded that appellants claim about amount being her winning from races is not genuine- It cannot be said that explanation offered by appellant in respect of said amounts has been rejected unreasonably and that finding that said amounts are income of appellant from other sources is not based on evidence - Appeals dismissed

JUDGMENT

S. C. AGRAWAL, J. :—These appeals filed by the assessee against the order dated February 24, 1977 passed by the Income-tax Settlement Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Settlement Commission), related to assessment years 1971-72 and 1972-73. The appellant carries on business as a dealer in art pieces, antiques and curios at Bangalore. During the assessment year 1971-72 the appellant received a total amount of Rs. 3,11,831/- by way of race winnings in Jackpots and Treble events in races at Turf Clubs in Bangalore, Madras and Hyderabad. The said amount was shown by the appellant in the capital account in the books. The appellant filed a return on March 27, 1972 declaring an income of Rs. 27,829/-. The appellant also made a sworn statement on January 6, 1973 before the Income-tax Officer and on the basis of the said statement the Income-tax Officer made an assessment order dated March 27, 1974 wherein he held that the sum of Rs. 3,11,831/- is not winnings in races and he treated the said receipts as income from undisclosed sources and assessed the same as income from other sources. For the assessment year 1972-73 the appellant showed receipts of Rs. 93,500/- as race winnings in two Jackpots at Bangalore and Madras and the said amount was credited in the capital account in the books. The appellant filed a return declaring an income of Rs. 3,827/- on February 3, 1973. In his assessment order dated August 31, 1974 the Income-tax Officer included the amount of Rs. 93,500/- as income from other sources and assessed income of the appellant on that basis. The appeals filed by the appellant against the two assessment orders were disposed of by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner by order dated December 12, 1975 whereby the assessment of Rupees 3,11,831/- as income under the head other sources for the assessment year 1971-72 and Rs. 93,500/- for the assessment year 1972-73 was confirmed. The appeals filed against the said order before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal were withdrawn by the appellant under Section 245M(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act),and on August 6, 1976 she moved the application giving rise to this appeal, before the Settlement Commission wherein the appellant stated that she was agreeable to a reasonable addition on a reasonable basis should the Commission hold that the drawings of 1970-71 and 1971-72 were not adequate for purchase of Jackpot tickets, other expenses in connection with the races and losses, if any, estimated by the Settlement Commission to have been sustained by the appellant. On the said application the Commissioner of Income-tax submitted his report dated January 29, 1977 wherein he urged that the action of the Department in taxing the entire winnings as income from undisclosed sources should be upheld inasmuch the appellant lacked any knowledge of race techniques and the theory of probabilities precluded any systematic and continuous winnings at races on as many as 16 occasions during a period of less than two years. In his report, the Commissioner also submitted that the books of accounts did not indicate the expenditure on travel and other incidental expenses which had been incurred by the appellant for attending the races at Bangalore and Hyderabad. The Commissioner also asked for reopening of the assessment year 1970-71 where the appellant had won a sum of Rs. 74,681/- and which was not brought to tax by the Income-tax Officer.

2. The matter was heard by three members of the Settlement Commission. By order dated February 24, 1977 two members of the Commission (Shri R. S. Chadda and Shri K. Srinivasan) upheld the assessment for the assessment years 1971-72 and 1972-73 made by the Income-tax Officer and confirmed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax; but did not find it possible under Section 245-E to accede to the request of the Commissioner of Income-tax that the assessment for 1970-71, which was made without bringing to tax the


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top