SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 633

B.L.HANSARIA, R.M.SAHAI
Padmavathy Amma – Appellant
Versus
Ammunni Panicker – Respondent


Advocates:
G.VISHVANATHA IYER, N.SUDHAKARAN, Nalini Poduval, P.S.POTI

JUDGMENT

HANSARIA, J. :—This appeal by special leave requires determination of the question as to whether the gift of the suit property by Padmanabha in favour of his sister was to the Tavazhi of the sister or was for the benefit of the sister alone. The parties being governed by Marumakkathayam Law, to answer the question, we shall have to refer to that law and ascertain the intention of the donor as reflected in the gift (which was brought on record in the trial Court as Ex. A-1); and then decide whether the gift to Kochukunhi has to enure to her benefit alone or to her Tavazhi.

2. Respondent No. 1 filed the suit at hand claiming one-third share in the gifted property as a son of Kochukunhi, who had another son and a daughter. The trial Court dismissed the suit. On appeal, the High Court held that the plaintiff was entitled to one-sixth share and remanded the case to the trial Court for fresh disposal after answering all the other issues in the suit. Feeling aggrieved, the daughter of Kochukunhi has filed this appeal.

3. Let the broad terms of the gift deed be first noted. The perusal of the same shows that the properties were gifted out of love and affection to the sister and her














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top