SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 364

KULDIP SINGH, S.SAGHIR AHMAD
Indian Council For Enviro Legal Action – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.MYLSAMY, A.MARIAPUTHAM, A.S.BHASME, A.S.NAMBIYAR, AMAN VACHHER, ANAND, ANAND PARKASH, Anjani Aiyagiri, ARUNA MATHUR, Asha N.Nair, ASHOK DESAI, C.V.SUBBA RAO, D.N.Mishra, D.V.Sehgal, DILIP SINHA, G.L.SANGHI, H.VAHI, HARISH N.SLAVE, J.P.PATHAK, J.R.DAS, K.L.Taneja, K.R.NAMBIAR, K.R.R.PILLAI, K.RAM KUMAR, KAPIL SIBAL, KIRAN BHARDWAJ, M.C.MEHTA, M.KARANJAVALA, MINAKSHI ARORA, MIRA KAPUR, NINA GUPTA, P.K.MANOHARAN, P.K.MULLICK, P.N.PURI, PRAVIN SARNTANI, R.B.Masodkar, R.K.MEHTA, R.K.P.SHANKAR DAS, R.N.KARANJAWALA, R.SASIPRABHU, R.THIAGARAJAN, RAMASUBRAMANIAM, RUBY SINGH AHUJA, S.K.DHOLAKIA, S.K.MEHTA, S.M.JADHAV, SHANTI BHUSHAN, SHISHIR SHARMA, SHRAMAN SINHA, SIMA MIDHA, T.V.S.N.Chari, V.B.NADKARNI, V.BALACHANDRAN, V.KRISHNAMURTHY, VINIT KUMAR

ORDER

We have heard Mr. Shanti Bhushan, Mr. Kapil Sibal, Mr. Ashok Desai, Mr. D. V. Sehgal and other learned counsel appearing in this case. We modify our order dated December 12, 1994 and direct that all the restrictions, prohibitions regarding construction and setting up of industries or for any other purpose contained in the notification dated February 19, 1991 issued by Ministry of Environment and Forest. Government of India under clause (d) of sub-rule (3) of rule 5 of the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 shall be meticulously followed by all the concerned States. The activities which have been declared as prohibited within the Coastal Regulation Zone shall not be undertaken by any of the respondent States. The regulations of permissible activities shall also be meticulously followed. The restrictions imposed by the Coastal Areas Classification and Development Regulations contained in Annexure 1 to the above said notification shall also be strictly followed by the respondent State.

2. Mr. M. C.Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that this Court should constitute a central authority and also in addition an authority in each of the coastal States/union ter



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top