SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
KULDIP SINGH AND S. SAGHIR AHMAD, JJ.
Indian Council for Enviro - Legal Action, petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents.
Writ Petition (Civil) No.664 of 1993
Decided on 9-3-1995.
Environment Protection - Coastal Regulation Zone - The court modified its previous order and directed strict adherence to the restrictions and prohibitions regarding construction and setting up of industries within the Coastal Regulation Zone. The court also considered the constitution of a central authority and authorities in coastal States/union territories for environmental protection.
Fact of the Case:
The court modified its previous order and directed strict adherence to the restrictions and prohibitions regarding construction and setting up of industries within the Coastal Regulation Zone. The court also considered the constitution of a central authority and authorities in coastal States/union territories for environmental protection.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the restrictions and prohibitions regarding construction and setting up of industries within the Coastal Regulation Zone must be meticulously followed. It also acknowledged the need for further consideration on the constitution of a central authority and authorities in coastal States/union territories for environmental protection.
Issues: Adherence to restrictions and prohibitions within the Coastal Regulation Zone, constitution of central and state authorities for environmental protection.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the need to protect the Coastal Regulation Zone by ensuring strict adherence to restrictions and prohibitions. The consideration of constituting central and state authorities for environmental protection was also a key factor.
Final Decision: The court directed strict adherence to the restrictions and prohibitions regarding construction and setting up of industries within the Coastal Regulation Zone. It also decided to further consider the constitution of a central authority and authorities in coastal States/union territories for environmental protection.
ORDER
We have heard Mr. Shanti Bhushan, Mr. Kapil Sibal, Mr. Ashok Desai, Mr. D. V. Sehgal and other learned counsel appearing in this case. We modify our order dated December 12, 1994 and direct that all the restrictions, prohibitions regarding construction and setting up of industries or for any other purpose contained in the notification dated February 19, 1991 issued by Ministry of Environment and Forest. Government of India under clause (d) of sub-rule (3) of rule 5 of the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 shall be meticulously followed by all the concerned States. The activities which have been declared as prohibited within the Coastal Regulation Zone shall not be undertaken by any of the respondent States. The regulations of permissible activities shall also be meticulously followed. The restrictions imposed by the Coastal Areas Classification and Development Regulations contained in Annexure 1 to the above said notification shall also be strictly followed by the respondent State.
2. Mr. M. C.Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that this Court should constitute a central authority and also in addition an authority in each of the coastal States/union territories in terms of Section 3(3) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. He has given a list of eminent persons in environmental field who can be asked to be members of the said authority. This matter needs further consideration and final decision in this respect shall be taken after hearing Mr. Mehta and other learned counsel for the parties.
3. Mr. Mehta has also placed on record the interim site visit report dated October 18, 1994 of the committee constituted by the Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India for inspection of violation of norms and guidelines prescribed for development activities for beach/resorts/hotels, etc. in the Coastal Regulation Zone of the State of Goa. We have examined the report and we find that the committee has done a useful work. We issue notice to the Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India through its Secretary and also to the State of Goa to file affidavits indicating the action taken in respect of the report of the committee. The Government of India shall furnish copy of the report to the State of Goa if it has not already been done. The affidavits shall be filed by the Government of India and State of Goa within two seeks of the receipt of this order.
Order accordingly.
For Citation: AIR 1995 SC 2252
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.