SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 316

B.L.HANSARIA, K.RAMASWAMY
Gurdial Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
G.K.BANSAL, PREM MALHOTRA, SANJAY BANSAL

JUDGMENT

A notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was published on Feb. 15, 1979, acquiring 4.5 acres of land for establishing in Milk Chilling-Cum-Demonstration Center at Village Sardulgarh in Bhatinda District of Punjab State. The Land Acquisition Officer in his award dated March 23, 1979, awarded a sum of Rs.13,816/- per acre as compensation. On reference, the Addl. Distt. Judge, Bhatinda, by decree dated April 30, 1981, enhanced the compensation to Rs.2,50,000/- per acre. On appeal under Section 54 by the State, the High Court in R.F.A. No. 1065 of 1981 and batch, by its order dated September 15, 1982, reduced the compensation to Rs.30,000/- per acre. Dissatisfied with the judgment of the High Court, the appellants filed these appeals by special leave.

2. Shri Prem Malhotra, learned Counsel appearing for the appellants, has strenuously contended that the sale deed (Exs. A1 to A5) and Mutation Proceedings (Exs. A7 to A16) would show that the market value ranged between Rs.3,12,000/- to Rs.1,08,000/-. He submitted that the High Court was not justified in relying upon the solitary mutation proceedings noted in the judgment to determine the compensation at R





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top