SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 397

S. P. BHARUCHA, A. M. AHMADI, K. S. PARIPOORNAN
K. L. Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Hari Shankar Bhandari – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The appellant having been convicted upon an application filed under Section 12, of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has preferred this appeal. The abridged facts relevant for the disposal of this appeal are that in writ petition M.P.No. 2159 of 1986, filed by the present respondent No.1 Hari Shankar Bhandari, the Division Bench of the High Court rejected the unqualified apology of the appellant, convicted him and directed him to pay a fine of Rs. 2000/- in default of payment of fine, a simple imprisonment of one month. It was further directed that the fine amount, if recovered, will be paid to the original petitioner - Hari Shankar Bhandari as compensation for the inconvenience suffered by him. The facts, however, show that after the disposal of the writ petition on 12th April, 1988 whereby it was directed that the petitioners pension case should be finalised within three months from the date of the order and all dues in regard to pension etc. shall be paid to him within one month thereafter with interest at 12% per annum together with Rs.100/- by way of costs, the authorities then incharge of the matter did not finalise the case till t



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top