SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 788

B.L.HANSARIA, K.RAMASWAMY
Chandigarh Housing Board – Appellant
Versus
Avtar Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
ANANT PALLI, Atul Sharma, L.K.PANDEY, REKHA PALLI

JUDGMENT

Leave granted.

2. This appeal by special leave arises from the order dated 22-7-1994 of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Writ Petition No. 3843/94. The admitted facts are that Regulation 6 of the Chandigarh Housing Board (Allotment, Management and Sale of Tenements) Regulations, 1979 (for short, the Regulations) regulates, among other things, allotment of the buildings / flats constructed by the appellant-Board. A wife / husband and the unmarried children or other members of the family, one, among them, alone is eligible for allotment of any building / flat. When the notification was published inviting applications for allotment of Category II flats, the 1st respondent as well as his wife, Mrs. Kuldip Kaur, separately applied for allotment of two houses. The allotments came to be made independently, but later on it was discovered that both of them being wife and husband, were not eligible. Consequently, the allotment made to the 1st respondent was cancelled and the amount paid by him was forfeited under the Regulations. When he filed the writ petition, the High Court in the impugned order directed the appellant - Board to return the entire money pa






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top