SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 836

K.RAMASWAMY, B.L.HANSARIA
Assistant Commissioner, Gadag Sub Division, Gadag – Appellant
Versus
Mathapathi Basavannewwa – Respondent


Advocates:
K.R.NAGARAJA

ORDER

An interesting question has been raised by Shri Nagaraja, learned counsel for the petitioner, in this case.

2. The admitted facts are that the petitioner had taken possession of the lands on 23-1-1971, but the notification under S.4(1) of the Land Acquisition act (for short the Act) was published in the Gazette on 2-8-1984. The award came to be made by the Land Acquisition Officer on 15-1-1986. The question is from what date the respondents-owners are entitled to the benefit of S.23(1-A) of the Act as amended by Act 68 of 1984.

Section23(1-A) reads thus :

"23(1-A) : In addition to the market value of the land, as above provided, the Court shall in every case award an amount calculated at the rate of twelve per centum per annum on such market value for the period commencing on and from the date of the publication of the notification under Section 4, sub-section (1), in respect of such land to the date of the award of the Collector or the date of taking possession of the land whichever is earlier."

(Emphasis supplied).

3. Learned counsel contended that conjoint reading of the dates of notification and making of award would connote that taking possession referable under the expressio







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top