SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 841

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.M. PUNCHHI AND Mrs. SUJATA V. MANOHAR, JJ.
H. Kashinath and others, Appellants
Versus
State of Karnataka and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 3367 of 1995
Decided on 21-8-1995.

Advocates:
M.R.JANARDHAN, M.VIRAPPA, P.Mahale, S.K.KULAKARNI, S.RAVINDER BHAT, SUBRAMANYA JOIS, T.KANAKA DURGA

Headnote:

Bangalore Development Authority Act of 1976 - Section 2(bb) - Eletricity Board - Comprehensive Development Plan - Government Order enhancing period of lease and reducing annual lease rent Accordingly by a Deed of Lease second respondent-Corporation granted to fourth respondent a lease of said plot for purpose of building a theatre for development of drama or films and in order impart training to artists- terms and conditions of lease are set out in Deed of Lease- appellants before us on coming to know of said lease filed a public interest writ petition before High Court Karnataka challenging allotment of this plot of land to fourth respondent- They contended that said plot which is situated in southern portion site is reserved for a public or semi-public purpose or for a civic amenity and that granting of lease to fourth respondent is not for purpose for which said site is earmarked under Comprehensive Development Plan- High Court however has rejected writ petition- Hence present appeal has come before for consideration –Held, Court of Karnataka Division Bench consisting of Justice Mohan Chief Justice as then was and Justice allotment of plot of land in same southern portion of this very site for construction of a community hall by Municipal Corporation of Bangalore City- This was also a public interest litigation challenging allotment of plot for construction of a community hall challenge was negative- That plot is not same plot present plot- However this plot is also situated within same southern portion of Survey which has been reserved for a public or semi public purpose Comprehensive Development Plan- In case before Karnataka High Court in above appeal however Corporation of City of Bangalore proposed to construct a community hall in a portion said area at a cost benefit of public- This was upheld as a public purpose and construction of a community hall by Corporation City of Bangalore was considered as civic amenity present lease however is for a purpose which is altogether different- Therefore respondents cannot derive any support from above case- On contrary it is clear that in above case also High Court has upheld contention of appellants that site in question namely southern portion is reserved for a public or semi-public purpose under Comprehensive Development Plan - Appeal allowed

Judgement

Mrs. SUJATA V. MANOHAR, J. : - This appeal pertains to a plot of land situated within C.A. No. 19 in the Vth Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore City. The total measurement of the site which lies between 38th Cross Road and 42nd Cross Road is 298 mtrs. x 91 mtrs. The site is in two parts. The northern portion admeasures 91 mtrs. East to West and 165 mtrs. North to South. It lies between 38th Cross Road and the storm water drain. The southern portion lies beyond the storm water drain and stretches up to the 42nd Cross Road. The dispute relates to a piece of land admeasuring 91 mtrs. x 91 mtrs. in the southern portion of this site lying between 10th and 11th Main Road and facing 42nd Cross Road.

2. In the Comprehensive Development Plan framed under the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961, which has been published under Section 23 of this Act, the northern portion of site No. 19 has been earmarked for a park and the southern portion is earmarked for a general purpose which is a public or semi-public purpose. We are concerned with the portion which is lying in the southern part of this site which is earmarked for a public or semi-public purpose.

3. At the request of the fourth respondent, namely, Karnataka Chalana Chitra Kalavindara Sangha, the Corporation of the City of Bangalore, second respondent herein, passed a Resolution dated 30-12-1983 resolving to grant the above plot admeasuring 91 mtrs. x 91 mtrs. to respondent No. 4 on a lease at an annual rent of Rs. 500/-. The Government of Karnataka accorded sanction for the same by its Order dated 10-5-1984 under which it granted approval for the lease for a period of 20 years on an annual lease rent of Rs. 750/- This was, however, modified by Government Order dated 5-10-1984 enhancing the period of the lease to 50 years and reducing the annual lease rent to Rs. 500/-. Accordingly, by a Deed of Lease dated 11th of May, 1986, the second respondent-Corporation granted to the fourth respondent a lease of the said plot for the purpose of building a theatre for the development of drama or films and in order to impart training to artists. The terms and conditions of the lease are set out in the Deed of Lease. The appellants before us, on coming to know of the said lease, filed a public interest writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the allotment of this plot of land to the fourth respondent. They contended that the said plot which is situated in the southern portion of site No. 19 is reserved for a public or semi-public purpose or for a civic amenity; and that granting of lease to the fourth respondent is not for the purpose for which the said site is earmarked under the Comprehensive Development Plan. The High Court, however, has rejected the writ petition. Hence the present appeal has come before us for consideration.

4. Respondent No. 4 is a society registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act. The objects of the fourth respondent-Association as set out in Clause (3) of the Memorandum of Association are as follows:

"(a) to promote the interests of the KANNADA FILM ARTISTS (Actor and Actresses) in the State of Karnataka and to work in harmony with such similar societies elsewhere in India:

(b) to promote and protect the rights and privileges of the Film Artists as against outsiders as well as between and among themselves;

(c) to provide basic and other amenities to the Film Artists either in the course of their profession or otherwise;

(d) to provide financial and other facilities to the family members of the Film Artists at times of distress due to death or any other disablement of such members;

(e) to provide financial and other benefits to the members of Film Artists to prosecute education of their children;

(f) to build and acquire auditorium to display shows and concerts for the benefit of the SANGHA as well as to raise funds to be utilised for achieving the objects mentioned herein and without involving any activity for profit;

(g) to raise f




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top