SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 161

G.L.OZA, M.M.DUTT
K. Ch. Prasad – Appellant
Versus
J. Vanalatha Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
A.SUBBA RAO, R.AYYAM PERUMAL, R.VENKATARAMANA

JUDGMENT

Oza, J.-This appeal has been filed by the appellant after obtaining leave from this Court against an order passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh dated 28-11-1983 wherein the High Court rejected a Revision Petition filed by the appellant.

2. Against the appellant a complaint was filed in the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad under Section 120(b) (sic. 120B) read with Sections 467 and 471 of the Indian Penal Cede. After summons were issued the appellant raised objection about the maintainability of this prosecution for want of sanction under Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The objection was rejected by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad and against the order of the Metropolitan Magistrate a Revision Petition was filed in the High Court, which has been rejected by the impugned order passed by the Andhra pradesh High Court.

3. The learned Metropolitan Magistrate held that Section 197 is attracted only when a public servant is not removable from his office save by or with the sanction of the Government. The appellant is an officer who is removable from his office by a competent authority and no sanction of the Government is necessary. Consequently Se












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top