SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 27

A.M.AHMADI, L.M.SHARMA
Jagdish Chander Bhatia – Appellant
Versus
Lachhman Das Bhatia – Respondent


ORDER

A.M Ahmadi, J. - Even though the dispute between the parties came La this Court from an initial order passed under section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, this Court realising that the dispute was between close relatives in respect of their interest in certain properties which were also the subject matter in a Civil Suit No. 434178 (Remand) of the Court of Sub-Judge, First Class, Delhi, advised the parties to have the same resolved through an Arbitrator. On the parties agreeing, this Court passed an order on September 5, 1986 recording the agreement to refer the dispute to arbitration and appointed Mr. Justice V.D. Misra, retired Chief Justice of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, as the Sole Arbitrator. The parties had agreed to deposit a sum of Rs. 3,000/- each with the Arbitrator to meet with this expenses and remuneration subject to further directions that may be made in that behalf. It was further directed that the learned Arbitrator will render a speaking award within four months. In view of the said it agreement, the appeal was allowed and the High Courts impugned order was set aside. It appears that thereafter one of the parties, namely, Jagdish Chander Bhat














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top