K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, S.P.BHARUCHA
Savita – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
ORDER
K. Jayachandra Reddy, J. - One Sham Lal alis Sham Sunder alongwith two others were tried for offences punishable under Sections 302, 302/ 34, and 307/34 I.P.C. and the trial court convicted all the three of them and sentenced each one of them to undergo imprisonment for life and also other terms of imprisonment and to pay some fine. The sentences were directed to run concurrently. They preferred an appeal to the High Court and the High Court agreeing with the findings of the trial Court dismisses the appeal. Questioning the same, they preferred S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 970/85 in this Court but the same was dismissed by this Court by an order dated 18.11.1985. It appears that during the pendency of the appeal before the. High Court, Sham Lal filed a petition to take action under the Punjab Borstal Act, 1926 but the same was dismissed. Against that order, it appears that a different S.L.P. was filed but that was also dismissed and we are not concerned with that at this stage. As against the order dismissing S.L.P. (Cri.) No. 970/85, Review Petition No. 134/89 was filed. Writ Petition No. 322 of 1988 was filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India questioning the vires of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.