SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 901

K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, G.N.RAY
P. Babu – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
G.S.NARAYAN, Guntur Prabhakar, U.R.Lalit

ORDER

K. Jayachandra, J. - There are three appellants - original accused Nos. 1,2 and 3. They were tried alongwith four others for offences punishable under Sections 148,302 and 302/149 I.P.C. These appellants were also charged under Section 302 simpliciter. The trial court acquitted all of them. The State preferred an appeal against the acquittal and the High Court while confirming the acquittal of A-4 to A-7, convicted the appellants under Sections 302/34 I.P.C. and sentenced each of them to undergo imprisonment for life. Hence the present appeal.

2. The prosecution case is as follows:

P. Narasinga Rao, the deceased in the case was working as a welder at Secunderabad. He had a vegetable shop also in the market and he used to attend to his shop in the evening. P.W. 16 is the maternal uncle of the deceased. He has also a vegetable shop in the same market. The accused are all related to each other. A-4’s younger brother was murdered on 4.8.1978. The deceased and two others were prosecuted in that case and the same ended in acquittal. All the accused herein and also the absconding accused Sriramulu were aggrieved with the acquittal and bore grudge against the deceased. The deceased told





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top