SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. Jayachandra Reddy, G.N. Ray, JJ.
P. Babu & Ors. - Appellant
versus
The State of A.P.- Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 341 of 1982
Decided on 1.10.1993
Held: Having carefully examined the evidence of P.Ws. 1 to 10 we see absolutely no grounds to reject their evidence. They are independent and truthful witnesses and their evidence establishes beyond all reasonable doubt that Ex. P-1 was duly and sincerely recorded as stated by the deceased. The view taken by the trial court that Ex. P-1 was fabricated, is highly erroneous and unsound. The High Court was fully justified in reversing the said finding.
(para 7)
Further held: Apart from the dying declaration, Ex. P.1, there is evidence of P.Ws. 2 to 4 also which has been relied upon by the High Court also. P.W. 2 after witnessesing the occurrence immediately rushed to the police station and informed the Police. As a matter of fact his name was mentioned in the dying declaration itself. P.W.4 deposed that he was selling groundnut on a push cart. He knew the accused and deposed that these accused persons attacked the deceased. The evidence of these two witnesses lends ample corroboration to the dying declaration. Therefore we see no grounds to interfere with the finding of the High court. (para 8)
ORDER
K. Jayachandra, J. - There are three appellants - original accused Nos. 1,2 and 3. They were tried alongwith four others for offences punishable under Sections 148,302 and 302/149 I.P.C. These appellants were also charged under Section 302 simpliciter. The trial court acquitted all of them. The State preferred an appeal against the acquittal and the High Court while confirming the acquittal of A-4 to A-7, convicted the appellants under Sections 302/34 I.P.C. and sentenced each of them to undergo imprisonment for life. Hence the present appeal.
2. The prosecution case is as follows:
P. Narasinga Rao, the deceased in the case was working as a welder at Secunderabad. He had a vegetable shop also in the market and he used to attend to his shop in the evening. P.W. 16 is the maternal uncle of the deceased. He has also a vegetable shop in the same market. The accused are all related to each other. A-4’s younger brother was murdered on 4.8.1978. The deceased and two others were prosecuted in that case and the same ended in acquittal. All the accused herein and also the absconding accused Sriramulu were aggrieved with the acquittal and bore grudge against the deceased. The deceased told P.W. 16 that the accused were intending to kill him. On 21.3.1979 at about 5 P.M., PW. 7, a neighbour of P.W. 16 was doing painting work in a house in Picket, Secunderabad and after completing that work, he was going home. At about 7 P.M. he came near the State Bank and saw A-1 to A-7 and the absconding accused Sriramulu and heard Srirumulu telling A-1 to A-4 to do away with the deceased. After coming home P.W.7 informed P.W. 16 about what he has heard on that day at about 6.30 P.M. P.W.2 who worked under the deceased, went to the shop of deceased to meet him on a cycle. The deceased asked him to take him to the police station as he had to mark his attendance. Then both of them went on the cycle to the Market Police Station. After marking the attendance, both of them were coming back to the shop of the deceased on cycle. When they reached the State Bank, from A-1 emerged from the lane and caught hold of the deceased. A-2 to A-7 also joined A-1. A-1 stabbed the deceased with knife on his chest. A-2 and A-3 axed the deceased on his back with axes. A-4 and A-7 stabbed the deceased with knives on various parts of his body. P.W. 2 ran to the police Station to give a report about the incident to the Inspector of Police, P.W. 21. who made an entry in the general diary and alongwith S.Is and Head Constables rushed to the scene of occurrence. They carried the deceased to the hospital. P.W. 10, the Civil Assistant Surgeon who was on duty, examined the injuries and found 10 injuries and issued the wound certicuate Ex. P. 6. P.W. 10 admitted the injured into Cardio-Thoracic Ward and asked the S.I. to fetch the Magistrate for recording the dying declaration. The S.I. returned after 15 minutes and reported that the Magistrate was not available in his residence at that time. P.W. 21 also was present at that time in the hospital. The asked P.W. 1 who was working as House Surgeon in the Casualty Department to record the dying declaration of the deceased. P.W. 1 recorded the dying declaration of the deceased Ex. P. 1 which was read out to the deceased and his thumb impression was taken. P.W. 1 handed over Ex. P. 1 to P.W. 21 in the presence of P.W. 19 another police Officer, who registered a case and the issued express F.I.R. P.W. 21 continued the investigation. P.W, 20 Assistant Professor of Thoracic Surgery was contacted and he came to the hospital at about 9 P.M. and found the deceased to be in a bad condition. There for he could not undertake any surgical treatment. The injured expired at about 11.10 P.M. and an altered F.I.R. was issued. The dead body was sent for post-mortem and the Doctor found a number of incised injuries, which could have been caused by knives and axes. The accused were arrested except Sriramulu and the accused who were arrest were charge-sh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.